KaT Framework Domain | Domain factor | N | Mean (SD) | Median | IQR† | Percent agreement to include‡ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DISCOVER | Important to include the DISCOVER domain in the overall KaT framework | 35 | 6.7 (0.70) | 7.0 | 0 | 97% |
It makes sense for the DISCOVER domain to feed into the central part of the KaT framework | 35 | 6.3 (0.94) | 6.0 | 1 | 91% | |
Knowledge users will find the DISCOVER domain useful. | 35 | 6.1 (1.09) | 6.0 | 2 | 91% | |
DISCOVER is an appropriate label | 35 | 5.0 (1.40) | 5.0 | 2 | 71% | |
The 3 sub-domains of DISCOVER (and their elements) make sense | 33 | 6.2 (0.70) | 6.0 | 1 | 94% | |
The 3 sub-domains of DISCOVER (and their elements) are comprehensive | 33 | 5.9 (1.04) | 6.0 | 1 | 88% | |
DEVELOP | Important to include in the overall KaT framework | 35 | 6.5 (0.81) | 7.0 | 1 | 86% |
Knowledge users will find it useful. | 35 | 5.7 (1.53) | 6.0 | 2 | 74% | |
The 5 sub-domains of DEVELOP (and their elements) make sense | 33 | 6.2 (0.93) | 6.0 | 1 | 91% | |
The 5 sub-domains of DEVELOP (and their elements) are comprehensive | 33 | 6.0 (0.88) | 6.0 | 0 | 91% | |
DISSEMINATE | Important to include in the overall KaT framework | 35 | 6.3 (0.86) | 7.0 | 1 | 94% |
Knowledge users will find it useful. | 35 | 5.6 (1.50) | 6.0 | 3 | 71% | |
The 4 sub-domains (and their elements) make sense | 33 | 6.2 (0.75) | 6.0 | 1 | 91% | |
The 4 sub-domains (and their elements) are comprehensive | 33 | 6.2 (0.76) | 6.0 | 1 | 94% | |
IMPLEMENT | Important to include in the overall KaT framework | 35 | 6.5 (0.81) | 7.0 | 1 | 94% |
Knowledge users will find it useful | 35 | 6.0 (1.43) | 7.0 | 2 | 83% | |
The 5 sub-domains (and their elements) make sense | 32 | 6.0 (1.01) | 6.0 | 1 | 91% | |
The 5 sub-domains (and their elements) are comprehensive | 32 | 6.0 (1.02) | 6.0 | 0 | 91% | |
3 BROAD DOMAINS | The three domains represented in the KaT framework is comprehensive in terms of capturing what is important to consider in the creation and uptake of KT tools | 35 | 5.54 (1.5) | 6.0 | 2 | 80% |
IMPACT DRIVERS | The label “Impact Drivers” appropriately conveys these four concepts | 35 | 5.4 (1.29) | 6.0 | 1 | 80% |
The order in which the four impact drivers are represented make sense | 35 | 5.2 (1.63) | 6.0 | 2 | 71% | |
The placement of the four impact drivers clearly illustrates that they should be considered across each of the three broad domains of the framework (i.e., develop, disseminate, implement) | 35 | 5.4 (1.58) | 6.0 | 2 | 74% | |
Integrated KT (iKT) | ||||||
It makes sense to include iKT as one of the impact drivers | 35 | 6.1 (1.23) | 6.0 | 1 | 91% | |
The 3 sub-domains of iKT (and their elements) make sense | 32 | 6.4 (0.72) | 6.0 | 1 | 97% | |
The 3 sub-domains of iKT (and their elements) are comprehensive | 32 | 6.3 (0.74) | 6.0 | 1 | 97% | |
EVALUATION | ||||||
It makes sense to include EVALUATION as one of the impact drivers | 35 | 6.1 (1.33) | 7.0 | 1 | 91% | |
The representation of EVALUATION across the 3 domainsmake sense | 32 | 5.8 (1.30) | 6.0 | 2 | 88% | |
The representation of EVALUATION across the 4 impact driversmake sense | 32 | 5.7 (1.40) | 6.0 | 2 | 88% | |
EVALUATION is included in all of the areas of the KaT framework that should consider evaluation | 31 | 6.0 (0.82) | 6.0 | 2 | 97% | |
SUSTAINABILITY | ||||||
It makes sense to include SUSTAINABILITY as one of the impact drivers | 35 | 6.2 (0.83) | 6.0 | 1 | 94% | |
The 4 sub-domains (and their elements) of SUSTAINABILITY make sense | 32 | 6.1 (0.70) | 6.0 | 1 | 97% | |
The 4 sub-domains (and their elements) of SUSTAINABILITY are comprehensive | 32 | 6.0 (0.88) | 6.0 | 1 | 97% | |
SCALABILITY | ||||||
It makes sense to include SCALABILITY as one of the impact drivers | 35 | 6.2 (0.86) | 6.0 | 1 | 91% | |
The 5 sub-domains (and their elements) of SCALABILITY make sense | 32 | 5.7 (1.15) | 6.0 | 1 | 88% | |
The 5 sub-domains (and their elements) of SCALABILITY are comprehensive | 32 | 5.9 (1.02) | 6.0 | 0 | 91% | |
CORE | The core is important to include as part of the overall KaT framework | 35 | 6.0 (1.43) | 6.0 | 1 | 83% |
The placement of the CORE clearly illustrates that a KT tool is the ultimate goal and end product resulting from using the KaT framework | 35 | 5.7 (1.62) | 6.0 | 2 | 69% | |
PLANNING | PLANNING, which encircles the core, is important to include as part of the overall KaT framework | 35 | 5.2 (1.61) | 6.0 | 3 | 60% |
The placement of PLANNING clearly illustrates that a plan can be generated for each or all of the three broad domains of the KaT framework (i.e., develop, disseminate, implement) | 35 | 4.9 (1.72) | 5.0 | 3 | 54% | |
ACTION PLAN | The ACTION PLAN is important to include as part of the overall KaT framework | 35 | 6.6 (0.77) | 7.0 | 1 | 97% |
Researchers will find it useful | 35 | 5.7 (1.33) | 6.0 | 3 | 74% | |
Health care providers will find it useful | 35 | 5.8 (1.20) | 6.0 | 3 | 77% | |
Policy or decision makers will find it useful | 35 | 5.7 (1.18) | 6.0 | 3 | 74% | |
It’s clear that the ACTION PLAN will be an output resulting from the use of the KaT framework | 35 | 6.0 (1.38) | 6.0 | 1 | 91% | |
The 7 outputs (and their elements) of the ACTION PLAN make sense | 32 | 5.9 (1.12) | 6.0 | 2 | 91% | |
The 7 outputs (and their elements) of the ACTION PLAN are comprehensive | 32 | 5.9 (1.11) | 6.0 | 2 | 91% | |
OVERALL KaT framework | The overall framework is clear (i.e., easy to understand or interpret) | 35 | 5.3 (1.33) | 6.0 | 1 | 77% |
The organization makes sense | 35 | 5.6 (1.34) | 6.0 | 1 | 83% | |
The KaT framework is a good reflection of its intended purpose (i.e., to guide the rigorous and efficient creation of KT tools) | 35 | 5.7 (1.30) | 6.0 | 2 | 74% | |
The KaT framework is comprehensive (i.e., it covers the important areas that need to be considered in the creation of KT tools and products) | 35 | 5.9 (1.10) | 6.0 | 1 | 89% | |
Researchers will find it useful | 35 | 5.8 (1.20) | 6.0 | 2 | 80% | |
Health care providers will find it useful | 35 | 5.3 (1.40) | 6.0 | 2 | 66% | |
Policy or decision makers will find it useful | 35 | 5.3 (1.40) | 6.0 | 2 | 63% | |
TABLE of existing KT tools | Knowledge users will find the TABLE of existing KT tools organized by targets useful | 35 | 5.4 (1.60) | 6.0 | 3 | 63% |
Knowledge users will find the TABLE of existing KT tools mapped to purpose categories useful | 35 | 5.4 (1.60) | 6.0 | 3 | 69% |