KaT domain (sub-domain) | Mean (SD) on a 5-point Likert scale |
---|---|
EXPLORE page of the conceptual KaT platform | |
 It’s important to provide the opportunity for knowledge users to identify their KT purpose | 4.79 (0.431) |
 I like the idea of selecting options from a series of drop-down menus to generate a KT purpose statement | 4.46 (0.624) |
 Overall, I like the idea of the conceptual Explore page | 4.54 (0.557) |
ACTION PLAN page of the conceptual KaT platform | |
 I like the idea that the Action plan would provide customized information to platform users | 4.65 (0.546) |
 I would find the table of existing KT tools a useful feature of the KaT platform | 4.55 (0.640) |
 It’s a good idea to show the quality* rating for each of the suggested KT tools | 4.41 (0.743) |
 It’s a good idea to show the relevance* rating for each of the suggested KT tools | 4.30 (0.776) |
 It’s important to provide platform users with an option to develop a new KT tool if they wish | 4.32 (0.775) |
 It’s important to provide platform users with an option to learn about integrated KT (defined as a process of involving all relevant knowledge users in the broad spectrum of research activities) | 4.38 (0.719) |
 It’s important to provide platform users with the option to learn about evaluating their KT tool | 4.57 (0.606) |
 It’s important to provide platform users with the option to learn about the sustainability of their KT tool | 4.45 (0.720) |
 It’s important to provide platform users with the option to learn about the scalability of their KT tool | 4.42 (0.696) |
Overall | |
 Based on my current understanding, the KaT platform would be relevant for my work | 3.97 (0.793) |
 Based on my current understanding, I would use the KaT platform in my work | 3.81 (0.835) |
 Overall, I like the idea of the KaT platform | 4.37 (0.635) |