Table 3 Proportion of interventions reporting RE-AIM dimensions and components
RE-AIM dimensions and components | Reporting frequency (n = 25) | Reporting proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|
Reach | ||
 Method to identify target population | 24 | 96.0 |
 Inclusion criteria | 16 | 64.0 |
 Exclusion criteria | 3 | 12.0 |
 Sample size | 25 | 100.0 |
 Participation rate | 9 | 36.0 |
 Characteristics of participants | 25 | 100.0 |
 Characteristics of non-participants | 8 | 32.0 |
 Representativeness | 18 | 72.0 |
aAverage of overall reach dimensions | 16.00 | 64.00 |
Efficacy/effectiveness | ||
 Measures/results for at least one follow-up | 24 | 96.0 |
 Intent to treat utilized | 5 | 20.0 |
 Quality-of-life measure | 23 | 92.0 |
 Baseline activity measured | 25 | 100.0 |
 Percent attrition | 16 | 64.0 |
aAverage of overall efficacy/effectiveness dimensions | 18.60 | 74.4 |
Adoption | ||
 Description of intervention location | 24 | 96.0 |
 Description of staff who delivered intervention | 22 | 88.0 |
 Method to identify target delivery agent | 16 | 64.0 |
 Level of expertise of delivery agent | 19 | 76.0 |
 Adoption rate | 3 | 12.0 |
aAverage of overall adoption dimensions | 16.80 | 67.2 |
Implementation | ||
 Intervention duration and frequency | 25 | 100.0 |
 Extent protocol delivered as intended | 0 | 0.0 |
 Measures of cost of implementation | 3 | 12.0 |
aAverage implementation dimensions | 9.33 | 37.3 |
Maintenance | ||
Individual-level maintenance | Â | Â |
  Was individual behavior assessed ≥ 6 months post-intervention | 23 | 92.0 |
  Was individual behavior assessed ≥ 24 months post-interventiona | 3 | 12.0 |
  Was individual behavior assessed ≥ 48 months post-interventiona | 4 | 16.0 |
Program-level maintenance | ||
  Indicators of program continuation | 2 | 8.0 |
  Some measure/discussion of alignment with organization/setting | 1 | 4.0 |
aAverage of overall maintenance dimensions | 6.60 | 26.4% |