|
Implementation outcomes at 6 months
|
Anticipated sustainmentb
|
Sustainment outcomes at 1.5 yearsc
|
Did anticipated sustainment align with reported sustainment?d
|
|---|
|
Sustainment anticipated
|
Significant challenges anticipated
|
Sustained
|
Partially sustained
|
Not sustained
|
Yes
|
No
|
Total
|
|---|
|
Implemented (n = 16)
|
11e
|
5
|
11e
|
3
|
2
|
9
|
7
|
16
|
|
Partially implemented (n = 5)
|
4
|
1e
|
3
|
1e
|
1e
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
|
Not implemented (n = 6)
|
5
|
1e
|
4
|
2e
|
0e
|
5
|
1
|
6
|
|
Total
|
20
|
7
|
18
|
6
|
3
|
18
|
9
|
27
|
- a4 teams had missing data
- bBased on open-ended responses to the question, “How likely is it that the practice will continue to be used at your site?” at the end of the 6-month initial implementation period
- cBased on responses to emailed survey asking, “Is the Gold Status Practice still used at your facility? Why/why not?” 1.5 years after initial implementation period
- dBased on comparison of anticipated sustainment and reported 1.5-year sustainment. Coded as yes, if anticipated sustainment AND reported sustained use. Coded as no, if significant challenges anticipated AND reported 1.5-year partial sustainment or not sustained
- eTwo-way concordance of ratings/responses
