Skip to main content

Table 1 Participation details by health system and FIT test type

From: What’s the “secret sauce”? How implementation variation affects the success of colorectal cancer screening outreach

Health system

Health system (# of clinics)

2016 adaptations total (types)

2017 adaptations total (types)

2016 # mailed

2016 CRC screened total, (%)a

2017 # mailed

2017 CRC screened total (% of mailed)

Prior CRC research

OC-Auto or OC-Light FIT

 System 1

2

3 (M, I, E)

4 (M, Ph, S, E)

354

69 (19.5%)

194

68 (35.1%)

 

 System 2

5

N/A

3 (M, Ph, S)

N/A

N/A

630

198 (31.4%)

YES

 System 3

2

3 (M, Ph, S)

3 (M, Ph, S)

111

25 (22.5%)

116

35 (30.2%)

 

 System 4

4

2 (M, Ph)

4 (M, Ph, S, E)

756

108 (14.3%)

379

104 (27.4%)

 

 System 5

5

2 (S, I)

2 (S, I)

326

86 (26.4%)

417

111 (26.6%)

YES

 System 6

1

N/A

2 (M, Ph)

N/A

N/A

189

49 (25.9%)

 

 System 7

8

3 (M, S, I)

3 (M, S, I)

329

93 (28.3%)

354

87 (24.6%)

 

 System 8

7

1 (I)

3 (Ph, S, I)

628

124 (19.7%)

479

117 (24.4%)

YES

 System 9

4

2 (M, Ph)

2 (M, Ph)

757

154 (20.3%)

626

152 (24.3%)

 

 System 10

1

1 (M)

3 (M, Ph, S)

132

20 (15.2%)

94

17 (18.1%)

 

 System 11

1

1 (M)

N/A

103

4 (3.9%)

N/A

N/A

 

 System 12

1

3 (M, Ph, S)

N/A

293

66 (22.5%)

N/A

N/A

 

Other FIT

 System 13

1

N/A

1 (M)

N/A

N/A

105

20 (19.0%)

 

 System 14

2

2 (M, E)

2 (M, E)

57

14 (24.6%)

70

13 (18.6%)

 

 System 15

1

N/A

2 (M, E)

N/A

N/A

89

12 (13.5%)

 

 System 16

5

2 (M, Ph)

3 (M, Ph, S)

369

53 (14.4%)

343

42 (12.2%)

 

 System 17

1

1 (M)

N/A

44

4 (9.1%)

N/A

N/A

 

Overall

51 Clinics

--

--

4259

20%

4085

25%

 
  1. M mailed versus in-person return, Ph phone reminders, S scrub list, I incentives, E 12-month exclusion
  2. aCRC screened = claims submitted for any CRC screening procedure within 6 months of the introductory letter mailing date, CRC screened total number (% screened among those who received the intervention)