Skip to main content

Table 2 Dose and measurement of intervention fidelity

From: Implementing an intrapartum package of interventions to improve quality of care to reduce the burden of preterm birth in Kenya and Uganda

Intervention

Proposed dose

Delivered dose

Fidelity measures and sources

Outputs

Data strengthening

• Initial training

• Monthly data collection and review sessions

• DQAs every 6 months

• Initial training

• Monthly data sessions, approx. 20 h/year

• 2 DQAs in Uganda, 3 in Kenya

• Training rosters

• Monitored completeness of monthly data on project dashboard

• DQA reports

• Published paper documenting increased completion rates after initial data strengthening publisheda

• Paper in press on data strengthening over the life of the project in Kenya

Modified WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist

• Initial training

• Checklists supplied for all births

• Initial training

• Checklists supplied for all births

• Training rosters

• Program records

• Periodic audits to assess completion rates by pause point

• Completion audits showed completion rates of 75–90% by study end

• mSCC-specific paper forthcoming

PRONTO simulation training and mentorship

• 5 trainings in Uganda

• 12 weeks of in situ training/mentoring in Kenya

• 7 trainings in Uganda plus 4 beside mentoring sessions

• 12 weeks of in situ training/mentoring in Kenya

• Training rosters

• Pre-post knowledge tests at initial and final training sessions

• Key simulations video-recoded and coded for uptake of evidence-based practices

• All facilities completed required simulations

• PRONTO-specific paper on changes in knowledge and evidence-based practice in recorded simulations forthcoming

Quality improvement Collaborative

• Initial training

• Coaching visits/ team meetings at facilities every 2 weeks

• 3–6 total Collaborative learning sessions per country

• Initial training

• 5 QI Collaborative sessions per country

• Program records

• Coaches logged visits and topics during meetings

• Collaboratives tracked indicators across facilities at each meeting

• All teams had indicators to present and change efforts to report at each collaborative.

• Indicators improved in each country collaborative

• QI-specific paper on QI team process and results forthcoming

  1. aKeating et al. [29]