Essential elements to “design for dissemination” within a research network—a modified Delphi study of the Community-Academic Aging Research Network (CAARN)

Table 1 Response rates by survey round and expert type

Expert	Invited	Round 1	Round 2	Round -3
Expert	Invited	n (column %)	n (column %)	n (column %)
Community partners	12 (39%)	12 (43%)	9^a(39%)	7 (35%)
Academic partners	12 (39%)	9 (32%)	9 (39%)	9 (45%)
CAARN staff and EC members	7 (22%) (3 CRA, 4 EC members)	7 (25%)	5 (22%)	4 (20%)
Totals responses (n, % of panelist that responded^b)	31 (100%)	28 (90%)	23 (82%)	20 (87%)

^a2 panelists left the invited organizations and contact information was not available
^b Calculated dividing the number of panelists that completed the survey by the number of panelists that received an invitation for that round (Round 1: 28/31, Round 2: 23/28, Round 3: 20/23)

ISSN: 2662-2211