Identifying and understanding the contextual factors that shaped mid-implementation outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in organizations implementing mental health recovery innovations into services

Table 3 Ratings assigned to CFIR constructs by innovation being implemented

Innovation	Family support group	WRAP	Staff training			Peer workers
CFIR constructs\ Site	New Brunswick 1 publicly funded, family support group	British Columbia not-for-profit, WRAP	New Brunswick 2 not-for-profit, staff training	Ontario not-for-profit, staff training	Manitoba 2 not-for-profit, staff training	Manitoba 1 not-for-profit, Peer worker	Québec publicly funded, peer workers
Adaptability (CoI)	+1*	−2	+2	−2	−1	+2	+1*
COVID-19-related external policy (OS)	−2	−2	−1	−2	−2	−2	−2
Implementation climate and relative priority (IS)	−1	−1*	−2	−2*	−1	+1*	+2*
Leadership engagement (IS)	−1	+2	+1	+1*	+1	+2	+2
Available resources (IS)	−2	−1*	+1*	+1	−1	−1	+2*
Engaging implementation teams during the COVID-19 pandemic (P)	−2	−1	−2	−2	−2	−1	+2

* Indicates that there exists a view that is contrary to the overall rating. CFIR Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, WRAP Wellness Recovery Action Planning. CoI characteristics of the intervention domain, OS outer setting domain, IN inner setting domain, P process domain

ISSN: 2662-2211