Table 3 The proportion of interventions reporting on RE-AIM indicators
RE-AIM dimensions and components | Frequency | Proportion |
|---|---|---|
Reach | ||
 Method to identify target population | 5 | 100% |
 Inclusion criteria | 5 | 100% |
 Exclusion criteria | 5 | 100% |
 Sample size | 5 | 100% |
 Participation rate | 2 | 40% |
 Characteristics of participants | 5 | 100% |
 Characteristics of non-participants | 1 | 20% |
Average of overall reach dimensions | 28 | 80% |
Efficacy/effectiveness | ||
 Measures/results for at least one follow-up | 5 | 100% |
 Intent to treat utilized | 3 | 60% |
 Quality-of-life (psychosocial) measures | 0 | 0% |
 Baseline activity measured | 2 | 40% |
 Percent attrition | 3 | 60% |
Average of overall efficacy/effectiveness dimensions | 13 | 52% |
Adoption | ||
 Description of intervention location | 5 | 100% |
 Description of staff who delivered the intervention | 5 | 100% |
 Method to identify target delivery agent | 1 | 20% |
 Level of expertise of a delivery agent | 3 | 60% |
 Adoption rate | 0 | 0% |
Average of overall adoption dimensions | 14 | 56% |
Implementation | ||
 Intervention duration and frequency | 4 | 80% |
 Extent protocol delivered as intended | 1 | 20% |
 Measures of cost of implementation | 2 | 40% |
Average implementation dimensions | 7 | 47% |
Maintenance | ||
 Assessed outcomes ≥6 months post-intervention | 0 | 0% |
 Status of program | 0 | 0% |
 Cost of maintenance | 0 | 0% |
Average of overall maintenance dimensions | 0 | 0% |