From: Implementation of an ED surge management platform: a study protocol
Activity | Objective | Target (ED, staff, patients, patient advisors) | Measurement tool and method | Outcome of interest |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Measuring fidelity of training | To determine if the staff are trained to a well-defined performance criteria | ED staff | Training evaluation survey | Trained/competent staff |
2. Measuring fidelity of intervention delivery | To determine if the sites have implemented SurgeCon as intended | ED | Software platform and champion participant observation | Successful implementation |
3. Examining contextual constructs and factors | To identify and describe the context in which the intervention occurs and the factors that influence implementation | ED staff | Champion observation, site coordinator report | Understanding contextual constructs and factors to develop a plan for overcoming the challenges and ensuring successful implementation |
4.Conducting patient-reported experiences, patient satisfaction telephone interviews, and semi-structured patient interview | To consult with patients, get feedback from them, study their lived-experiences | ED patients | Patient-reported experiences and patient satisfaction survey and semi-structured patient interview guide | Develop strategies to overcome the challenges of patient satisfaction |
5. Conducting interview about barriers and enablers | To study organizational climate of ED before, during, and after the intervention and consult with ED staff to gauge interest in newly implemented ED management system | ED staff | Semi-structured interview | Resolving potential contextual barriers to successful implementation |