From: Implementation of an ED surge management platform: a study protocol
Activity | Objective | Target (ED, staff, patients, patient advisors) | Measurement tool and method | Outcome of interest |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Assessing scalability of SurgeCon | To identify the extent to which the intervention can be maintained and carried out in other ED departments | ED | RE-AIM scoring and CFIR instrument | Scalable SurgeCon platform |
2. Measuring the cost of implementing the intervention | To measure the cost of maintaining the intervention (e.g. system updates, staff training, etc.) and maintaining the restructured ED and its patient-centered environment | ED | Economic analysis | Cost of implementation |
3. Assessing feasibility of maintaining SurgeCon | To identify the issues raised and their relevance to maintaining the intervention | ED | RE-AIM scoring instrument, champion observation, and site coordinator report | Making changes or resolving challenges as a result of intervention |
4. Conducting patient-reported experiences, patient satisfaction telephone interviews, and semi-structured patient interview | To consult with patients, get feedback from them, study their lived-experiences | ED patients | Patient-reported experiences and patient satisfaction survey and semi-structured patient interview guide | Develop strategies to overcome the challenges of patient satisfaction |
5. Conducting interviews about barriers and enablers to institutionalization | To study organizational climate of ED after the intervention implementation | ED staff | Semi-structured interview | Resolving potential contextual barriers to successful maintenance |