Skip to main content

Table 2 Discrete strategies and specifications identified by stakeholders across interviews and workshops

From: A stakeholder-driven method for selecting implementation strategies: a case example of pediatric hypertension clinical practice guideline implementation

Strategy category

Discrete strategy

Actor(s)

Action(s)

Temporality

Dosage

Training

Asynchronous training of MA/nurses

Trainers: video (School of Medicine, available materials with pediatric standardized patient)

Trainees: MAs/nurses

• Training in BP measurement techniques and context (refreshers)

• Training in EHR strategies for EBP

• New hires

• Transfers/inter-departmental changes to pediatrics (within 1 week of starting)

• 20–30 min

Synchronous training of MA/nurses

Trainers: BP champion(s), MA trainer or lead MA

Trainees: MAs/nurses

• In vivo BP measurement technique and context training

• Training in EHR strategies for EBP

• BP measurement spot-checks

• Immediately following asynchronous training (above)

• Spot-checks: ongoing

• 15–20 min (total)

• Spot-checks: quarterly, 5–10 min

Training of MA/nurses in manual BP reading

Trainers: BP champion(s), Video (School of Medicine, available materials with pediatric standardized patient)

Trainees: MAs/nurses

• Training in manual BP measurement techniques

• Manual BP measurement spot-checks

• New hires

• Transfers/inter-departmental changes to pediatrics (within 1 week of starting)

• Spot-checks: ongoing

• 20–30 min

Asynchronous training of pediatric clinicians

Trainer: video

Trainees: pediatric clinicians

• Training in BP measurement techniques and context (particularly for pediatric practices)

• How to address EBP, etc.

• Training in EHR strategies

• Annually

• One training for diagnosis

• One training for treatment/management (~15 min each)

Synchronous training of pediatric clinicians

Trainer: specialist (e.g., pediatric nephrologist)

Trainees: pediatric clinicians

• Psychoeducation (grand rounds, in-service, counseling strategies, case presentations)

• Annually

• 50–60 min

Audit and feedback

Feedback reports

• Data team

• Alliance-generated report

• Targets: pediatric clinicians, (support staff)

• Dashboard report

• Practice-level comparisons,

• Individual clinician performance (combined with annual review)

• Report generation and review: as needed (recommended: monthly to quarterly, combined with other data reports/reviews)

• To providers: 6 months (combined with incentive structure)

• ~10 min per meeting

Workflow changes

Workflow changes

Operations director (to MAs)

• Specification and dissemination of new workflow

• Within 1 month of implementation launch

• 1–2 h

Staffing changes

Develop new position

• Operations director/practice manager

• Residency/intern manager

• Describe the position and hire; develop a business plan to justify position

• Within 1 month of implementation launch

• 6–8 h

Shift tasks among existing positions

• Operations director/practice manager

• Residency/intern manager

• Specify new expectations (population health tool)

• Relieve other duties and reassign as needed

• Within 1 month of the launch of the population health tool

• 1–2 h

Visual reminders/materials (non-digital)

Visual reminders for staff

• Operations director/practice manager

• Marketing team

• Make materials available and accessible

• Within 1 month of implementation launch

• Refresh as needed

• 2–5 min per patient, as needed (to use materials)

• May require time to create materials

Materials for patients/families

• Operations director (for workflow change)

• MAs (sending messages)

• Send email or snail mail to indicated patients/families

• Within 1 month of implementation launch

• Refresh as needed

• 1–2 h/week

HIT solutions/features

EHR reminders and features

• Alliance, individual health center’s EHR department

• Target: pediatric clinicians, support staff

• Programming EHR (order sets, clinical decision tree quick-link)

• Within 1 month of implementation launch, use with every patient as necessary

• 1–2 min/patient

Population builder (population health tool)

Identify at-risk patients/populations

• BP champion(s)

• Trainees

• Data team

• Case managers

• Run population queries and review

• Flag at-risk patients (scheduled or need follow-up)

• Weekly to monthly

• 5–20 min/week (highly variable)

Patient care huddles

• Care team (pediatric clinicians and support staff, case managers)

• Meeting to review results of population health tool query

• Daily

• 5–10 min, 1–2 times/day

Leadership support

Engaging leadership

• Pediatric clinicians

• Quality Improvement team

• External actors from relevant interest groups (AAP, AllianceChicago)

• Meetings

• Materials to make the case

• Prioritization within strategic plan/quality improvement plan

• Highly variable per CHC (more effort up front, with ongoing time commitment)

• Variable, dependent on the current stage of change

Financial support

Provider incentives

• Leadership: COO, CEO, CFO

• HRSA,

• UDS measures

• Insurance companies

• Integrate within existing pediatric provider incentive structure plan and financial model

• 6 months (performance review schedule)

• Requires 2–3 h up front, minimal time once integrated

Accessing funding (positions, equipment)

• Leadership: COO, CEO, CFO

• Add/integrate into yearly budget

• Clinic space: work with facilities

• Ongoing (e.g., replace broken equipment, as needs arise)

• 30–60 min for budget planning

  1. Notes. Actor indicates “Who does this?”; Action(s) indicate “what do the actors do?”; Temporality specifies “When was the strategy used?”; and Dosage refers to frequency of use and time involved in each use. We do not include “action target,” “implementation outcome,” or “justification”, which are elements of the Proctor et al. (2013) suggestions for specifying strategies. This is because some of these appear elsewhere in the IRLM. For example, superscripts in Fig. 2 indicate linkages between strategy and determinant (which is often part of “action target”), and potential mechanisms are described as well, which are part of both “action target” and “justification”; implementation outcomes are also included in the IRLM