Table 5 Multivariate multinomial logistic regression of TDF and CFRI scales and individual items on advocate for PrEP care (adjusted by profession—physicians vs non-physicians)
Scale/item | OR; 95% CI Extreme unlikely/very unlikely vs very likely/extremely likely | OR; 95% CI Likely vs very likely/extremely likely | Overall p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
I. Scale of characteristics of PrEP | 0.69; 0.52–0.92 | 0.86; 0.72–1.03 | 0.02 |
II. Population needs and resources | |||
 1. Scale of attitudes | 0.81; 0.68–0.96 | 0.85; 0.74–0.98 | < 0.001 |
 2. Scale of concerns | 0.87; 0.73–1.02 | 1.08; 0.96–1.22 | 0.14 |
 3. Beliefs about consequences | |||
  PrEP would take resources that could be better used to improve access to antiretroviral medications | 1.28 (0.62–2.64) | 1.46 (1.12–1.92) | < 0.001 |
  PrEP would lead to the use of medications for HIV prevention (medicalization of HIV prevention) | 11.6 (3.59–37.9) | 1.19 (0.54–2.62) | < 0.001 |
  I believe PrEP would result in a reduction condom use | 1.19 (0.49–2.86) | 1.68 (1.12–2.05) | < 0.001 |
IV Characteristics of Individuals | |||
 6. Control over the decision to offer PrEP care | 0.42 (0.29–0.61) | 0.76 (0.42–0.1.40) | < 0.001 |