Classes of spillovers | Number of papers | Direction of spillovera) | Type of mechanism |
---|---|---|---|
Within-unit | 55 | Favourable: 35 Unfavourable: 9 Both: 1 Null: 10 | .Learning effects, improvement in overall skills/knowledge/awareness |
.Chain response in related behaviours (e.g. physical activity and food intake) | |||
.Complementarity or substitution (in use of inputs or consumption of goods/services) in response to changes in prices or quantities | |||
.Shared resources, complementary activities, shared fixed costs | |||
.Excessively bureaucratised or structured procedures generating changes in others | |||
Diagonal | 38 | Favourable: 21 Unfavourable: 5 Both: 2 Null: 10 | .Complementarity or substitution (in use of inputs or consumption of goods/services) in response to changes in prices or quantities |
.Spatial diffusion of the effect (due to ecological mechanisms, proximity, overlapping catchment areas, etc.) | |||
.Shared resources, complementary activities, shared fixed costs | |||
.Social referencing, social learning | |||
.Learning effects, improvement in overall skills/knowledge/awareness | |||
.“Welcome-mat” effect (entering a social protection scheme improves the likelihood of getting access to others through increased knowledge of rules, regulations, availability, etc. for same individuals and family members or friends) | |||
Between-units | 36 | Favourable: 27 Unfavourable: 4 Both: 1 Null: 4 | .Social network effect, social learning, “word of mouth” |
.Spatial diffusion of the effect (due to ecological mechanisms, proximity, overlapping catchment areas, etc.) | |||
.Shared resources, complementary activities, shared fixed costs | |||
.“Welcome-mat” effect (entering a social protection scheme improves the likelihood of getting access to others through increased knowledge of rules, regulations, availability, etc. for the same individuals and family members or friends) |