Comparing two federal financing strategies on penetration and sustainment of the adolescent community reinforcement approach for substance use disorders: protocol for a mixed-method study

Table 1 Waves of planned data collection for state-focused grant cohorts

Grant cohort (years)	Target # of organizations	Expected # of respondents	Data collection waves: years since funding ended
Grant cohort (years)	Target # of organizations	Expected # of respondents	Wave 1 (2021–2022)	Wave 2 (2022–2023)	Wave 3 (2023–2024)	Wave 4 (2024–2025)
(1) 2013–2017	7 states 37 organizations	7 state agency administrators 33 clinicians 47 supervisors	4 years Post-funding	^a5 years post-funding	NA	NA
(2) 2012–2018	7 states 33 organizations	7 state agency administrators 29 clinicians 42 supervisors	3 years Post-funding	^a4 years post-funding	^a5 years Post-funding	NA
(3) 2017–2021	5 states 21 organizations	5 state agency administrators 19 clinicians 27 supervisors	0 years Post-funding	^a1 year post-funding	^a2 years Post-funding	^a3 years Post-funding

In each data collection wave, we will collect semi-structured interviews from all eligible participants, web-based surveys from eligible clinicians and supervisors, and grant-related documents for review from eligible state agency administrators
NA not applicable (i.e., data are not collected because the data collection wave falls more than five years post-funding)
^a Treatment organizations that reported not sustaining the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA) in the previous wave will not be eligible unless they report having restarted A-CRA delivery since the previous wave

ISSN: 2662-2211