Comparing two federal financing strategies on penetration and sustainment of the adolescent community reinforcement approach for substance use disorders: protocol for a mixed-method study

Table 2 Data collection activities for comparing A-CRA penetration outcomes between grant types

Activity	Measures	Participants	Time	Compensation	Relevant Aims^a
Administrative data from CHS		Clinicians, supervisors^b	n/a	n/a
	Proportion certified				Aim 1a, 1b, 3
	Descriptive data about fidelity scores				Aims 1a, 1b
Web survey (Wave 1)			30 min	$25	Aims 1b, 3
	External support [65]	Supervisors^b
	Leadership support (ILS [66])	Clinicians^b
Semi-structured interviews (Wave 1)			45 min	$25	Aims 1a, 1b, 3
	Organization-reported barriers/ facilitators of A-CRA implementation	Clinicians, supervisors^b
	State agency-reported barriers/ facilitators of A-CRA implementation	State behavioral health agency administrators
Document review	A-CRA implementation-related documents	State behavioral health agency administrators	as needed	n/a	Aims 1a, 1b, 3

A-CRA Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach, CHS Chestnut Health Systems, ILS Implementation Leadership Scale
^aSee Fig. 1 for details of the project aims and how they relate to each other
^bData collected from organization-focused grantees in the previous project will be included in the analysis

ISSN: 2662-2211