Skip to main content

Table 2 Context of studies included in the mhIST psychometric analysis

From: Psychometric performance of the Mental Health Implementation Science Tools (mhIST) across six low- and middle-income countries

   

Clients

Providers

   

Target population

 

Female

Age

Provider background

 

Female

Age

Study

Setting

Intervention

n

(%)

(Mean, SD)

n

(%)

(Mean, SD)

Marsch et al. [31]

Colombia

BA, PST, CBT

Adults with depression, AUD

117

76.9

54.7 (15.9)

Primary care providers

30

63.3

37.4 (7.8)

Lee et al., [20]

Karen State & Yangon, Myanmar; Mae Sot, Thailand

CETA

Adults affected by conflict or political persecution

198

78.3

36.0 (1.2)

Lay health workers

34

47.1

42.1 (2.2)

Lee et al. [21]

Kachin State, Myanmar

CETA

IDP youths

n/a

n/a

n/a

Lay health workers

18

77.8

27.6 (8.4)

Hamdani et al. [32]

Pakistan

Parents Skills Training

Caregivers of children with developmental delays

166

100

35.0 (7.6)

Caregivers of children with developmental delays

10

100

34.9 (4.4)

Murray et al. [33]

Ukraine

CETA

IDP and veterans

77

63.6

38.9 (9.9)

Psychologists, social workers, and lay health workers

30

86.7

41.0 (9.6)

Kane et al. [34]

Zambia

CETA

Families with IPV and unhealthy alcohol use

256

51.9

29.9 (11.2)

Lay health workers

n/a

n/a

n/a

Murray et al. [35]

Zambia

TF-CBT

Adolescents with HIV risk behaviors

n/a

n/a

n/a

Lay health workers

101

76.2

44.3 (11.2)

  1. AUD Alcohol use disorder, BA Behavioral activation, CBT Cognitive behavioral therapy, CETA Common Elements Therapeutic Approach, IDP Internally displaced persons, IPV Interpersonal violence, mhIST Mental Health Implementation Science Tools, n/a not applicable (not included in study), PST Problem solving therapy, SD Standard deviation, TF-CBT Trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy