Table 4 Class comparisons on clinician characteristics, climate perceptions, and MFS use

> 30 years old

44%

47%

40%

1.76 [0.68, 4.59]

0.25

> 5 years of BH experience

48%

45%

50%

0.92 [0.37, 2.32]

0.87

Total caseload

20.53 (10.22)

20.37 (11.35)

20.70 (9.09)

1.00 [0.96, 1.05]

0.89

Implementation Climate Scale

2.22 (0.77)

2.48 (0.65)

1.95 (0.8)

2.80 [1.37, 5.72]

0.01

 Focus on EBP

2.77 (0.87)

3.03 (0.69)

2.51 (0.96)

2.36 [1.26, 4.43]

0.01

 Educational Support for EBP

2.02 (0.86)

2.28 (0.76)

1.74 (0.89)

2.36 [1.26, 4.42]

0.01

 Recognition for EBP

1.92 (1.04)

2.31 (0.90)

1.50 (1.02)

2.40 [1.37, 4.19]

<0.01

 Rewards for EBP

2.55 (0.87)

2.81 (0.72)

2.29 (0.94)

2.18 [1.18, 4.02]

0.01

 Selection for EBP

2.76 (0.77)

2.98 (0.66)

2.54 (0.83)

2.27 [1.13, 4.55]

0.01

 EBP Openness

0.79 (1.02)

0.88 (1.02)

0.70 (1.03)

1.17 [0.72, 1.19]

0.53

 Average rate of cases completed at least 1 assessment

0.85 (0.35)

0.89 (0.17)

0.82 (0.46)

1.53 [0.38, 6.14]

0.55

 Average rate of cases completed at least 2 assessments

0.71 (0.42)

0.76 (0.26)

0.65 (0.51)

1.68 [0.53, 5.36]

0.38

 Average rate of cases provided feedback based on MFS

0.40 (0.40)

0.59 (0.39)

0.23 (0.32)

10.32 [2.61. 40.87]

<0.01

 Average rate of cases changed treatment approach based on MFS

0.28 (0.59)

0.40 (0.67)

0.17 (0.49)

2.03 [0.65, 6.30]

0.22