Skip to main content

Table 3 Descriptive statistics on Mi-PARIHS Tool (n = 51a)

From: Mobilising Implementation of i-PARIHS (Mi-PARIHS): development of a facilitation planning tool to accompany the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework

Questions

Number

Per cent

Do you find the background content clear and easy to understand?

Extremely clear

11

21.57%

Very clear

33

64.71%

Moderately clear

7

13.73%

Slightly clear

0

0.00%

Not clear at all

0

0.00%

Is there any additional information that should be included?

Yes

16

31.37%

Unsure

12

23.53%

No

23

45.10%

Do you find this tool clear and easy to understand?

Extremely clear

6

11.76%

Very clear

24

47.06%

Moderately clear

16

31.37%

Slightly clear

3

5.88%

Not clear at all

0

0.00%

How user-friendly do you find this tool?a

Extremely user friendly

6

11.76%

Very user friendly

24

47.06%

Moderately user friendly

16

31.37%

Slightly user friendly

2

3.92%

Not user friendly at all

1

1.97%

Please select which features you like about this toolb

Inclusion of instructions

25

14.88%

This is a ‘living document’ that can be tweaked or adapted to suit a user’s project

31

18.45%

Domain-specific questions that can be assessed on a scale of barrier to enabler

39

23.21%

The auto-generated radar diagram/visual representation

36

21.43%

The barriers are highlighted and populated on a separate page

32

19.05%

Is this a tool you would use?

Strongly agree

21

42.86%

Somewhat agree

20

40.82%

Neither agree nor disagree

6

12.24%

Somewhat disagree

2

4.08%

Strongly disagree

0

0.00%

At which stage of implementation would you use this tool?b

Planning implementation

30

27.78%

Guiding implementation

32

29.63%

Evaluating implementation

46

42.59%

Overall, how satisfied, or dissatisfied are you with this tool?

Extremely satisfied

12

24.49%

Somewhat satisfied

26

53.06%

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

9

18.37%

Somewhat dissatisfied

2

4.08%

Extremely dissatisfied

0

0.00%

  1. aSeven participants did not complete the tool section
  2. bParticipants could select all that applied