Skip to main content

Table 2 Criterion-specific INSPECT rating frequencies for the DISC ACTRI pilot review of n = 10 proposals

From: Enhancing review criteria for dissemination and implementation science grants

INSPECT criterion

Rating scale

Total average, M (SD)

0

1

2

3

The care, quality, community gap, or need

0 (0%)

1 (6%)

9 (50%)

8 (44%)

2.39 (0.61)

The evidence-based treatment to be implemented

0 (0%)

4 (22%)

9 (50%)

5 (28%)

2.06 (0.73)

Conceptual model, theory or framework, and theoretical justification

0 (0%)

7 (39%)

7 (39%)

4 (22%)

1.83 (0.79)

Stakeholder priorities and engagement in change

1 (6%)

4 (22%)

9 (50%)

4 (22%)

1.89 (0.83)

Settings readiness to adopt new services/treatment/programs

2 (11%)

10 (56%)

5 (28%)

1 (6%)

1.28 (0.75)

D&I strategy/process

3 (17%)

3 (17%)

9 (50%)

3 (17%)

1.67 (0.97)

Team experience with setting, treatment, and D&I process

0 (0%)

3 (17%)

12 (67%)

3 (17%)

2.00 (0.59)

Feasibility of proposed research design and methods

3 (17%)

6 (33%)

9 (50%)

0 (0%)

1.33 (0.77)

Measurement and analysis

2 (11%)

8 (44%)

3 (17%)

5 (28%)

1.61 (1.04)

Policy/funding environment and leverage or support for sustaining change

3 (17%)

7 (39%)

5 (28%)

3 (17%)

1.44 (0.98)