Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of KT experts who participated in the Delphi study

From: Improving KT tools and products: development and evaluation of a framework for creating optimized, Knowledge-activated Tools (KaT)

Characteristic

Round 1 (n = 35)

Round 2 (n = 19)

Round 3 (n = 26)

Country

 Canada

  Ontario

17 (49%)

12 (63%)

14 (56%)

  Québec

7 (20%)

3 (16%)

6 (24%)

  Manitoba

1 (3%)

1 (5%)

1 (4%)

  Alberta

5 (14%)

3 (16%)

3 (12%)

  British Columbia

1 (3%)

-

-

  Newfoundland

1 (3%)

-

-

 Australia

2 (6%)

-

-

 USA

1 (3%)

-

1 (4%)

Role*

 Researcher, Scientist and/or Assistant/Associate/Full Professor

45

22

32

 Clinician

7

3

6

 Other

7

4

3

Years of KT and implementation science experience

 1–5 years

10 (29%)

6 (32%)

7 (28%)

 6–10 years

16 (46%)

8 (42%)

11 (44%)

 11–15 years

6 (17%)

3 (16%)

4 (16%)

 > 15 years

3 (9%)

2 (11%)

3 (12%)

KT expertise*

 KT practice or science

47

26

34

  Implementation

26

15

16

  Dissemination

21

12

14

  Integrated KT (iKT)

25

15

20

  Sustainability

9

8

8

  Scalability

6

5

5

  1. *Participants had multiple roles and KT expertise