Protocol for comparing two training approaches for primary care professionals implementing the Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) model

Table 3 Study measures related to specific aims

Domain/measure	Aims	Respondent*	Baseline** A: mo 8 B: mo 15	Training A: by mo 9 B: by mo 16	F/U 1 A: mo 20 B: mo 27	F/U 2 A: mo 29 B: mo 36	F/U 3 A: mo 41 B: mo 48
Organizational
System Demographics	1, 2, 3	SL	●			●
Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale	1, 2, 3	All, except parents	●		●	●	●
Implementation Leadership Scale	1, 2, 3	All, except parents	●		●	●	●
Implementation Climate	1, 2, 3	All, except parents	●		●	●
Implementation Process
Stages of Implementation	2, 3	AS	●	●	●	●	●
Adoption
SEEK Adoption Survey	2, 3	SL, PL, PCP	●
SEEK Training
SEEK Training Evaluation	1, 2, 3	PCP		●
Child Maltreatment
EHR review***		IT			●		●
Implementation Outcomes
SEEK PCP Questionnaire	1, 2, 3	PCP	●	●	●		●
SEEK PCP Survey	1, 2, 3	PCP			●	●	●
SEEK Office Staff	1, 2, 3	AS			●	●	●
SEEK Parent View	1, 2, 3	P			●	●	●
Rate of screening	1, 2, 3	EHR	●	●	●	●	●
Receipt of services	1, 2, 3	EHR	●	●	●	●	●
Costs
Cost of Implementing New Strategies (COINS)	2, 3	PL, AS, PCP		●	●	●	●
General
Qualitative phone interviews	1, 2, 3	All		●	●	●	●

*SL system leaders, PL practice leaders, PCP primary care providers, BHP behavioral health professionals, AS ancillary staff, P parents, IT = information technology
**A = 1st cohort of healthcare systems and practices, B = 2nd cohort of healthcare systems and practices
***EHRs will be reviewed by IT toward end of study

ISSN: 2662-2211