Intervention component | Description | Who implemented | Uganda modifications | Kenya modifications | Key insights and challenges |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data strengthening | GA estimation and indicator definition review. Data quality/completeness monitoring and feedback | 5 data specialists in Kenya, and 2 in Uganda | Continuous support rather than a single training | Continuous support rather than a single training | • Staff shortages, inconsistent supply of appropriate resources/reporting tools, and data storage infrastructure affected implementation • Challenge to identify and select key people to participate in data trainings, which affected reach • Facility staff’s lack of internet access to view Data Dashboard limited its utility at study sites • Bottom up approach could be better complemented by MoH engagement for sustainability prospects |
Modified WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist | A modified checklist with 5 pause points and a focus on identification and care of preterm/low birthweight babies | 2 clinical staff team and 2 data specialists in Uganda, 4 clinical staff team in Kenya | Split up per pause points and integrated in the maternity patient chart to make it user friendly and for consistency | Integrated into the maternity inpatient chart by being attached either at the back or in front of the patient chart. A small monetary incentive implemented | • Modification of mSCC raised profile of preterm babies • Duplicative nature between patient chart and mSCC created unnecessary documentation and burden for personnel • Financial incentive in Kenya threatened sustainability of tool • Continued use of mSCC is reliant on administration and policymakers |
PRONTO simulation training and mentorship | Simulation-based training and mentorship focusing on intrapartum and immediate newborn care. Complemented by clinical bedside mentoring | 10 mentors (2 nurses and 8 clinicians) in Uganda and, 5 nurses in Kenya | • Curriculum adjusted to reflect Ugandan MOH protocols and guidelines • Curriculum revised to focus on newborn care, particularly preterm care • The duration of mentorship was increased from one to two days to enable bedside mentorship • Additional clinical mentorship visits included for 2-day bedside mentorship | • Facility mentorship days reduced from 5 to 4 days per week to give room for adequate debrief and preparation for the next facility/ week work. • Curriculum aligned with the existing Kenya MOH protocols • Additional adjustments made to address (a) Birth preparedness for preterms; (b) referral management; and (c) immediate management and transfer of a preterm in a warm environment (skin-skin, KMC, warming blankets, referral systems) | • PRONTO approach and onsite mentorship enhanced the learning experience • High staff turnover/rotation affected consistency of PRONTO participation and dosages in training across curriculum • Contextual suitability and sustainability of PRONTO warrants further attention, such as training cascades (e.g., expert and resident mentors) |
Quality improvement Collaborative | Model for Improvement approach: QI teams conduct PDSA cycles and share experiences in learning sessions. Indicators to track progress included: GA estimation, ACS to eligible mothers, and KMC care | 1 QI coach and 10 PRONTO mentors in Uganda, 2 QI coaches in Kenya | Included process indicators of mSCC, partograph, and monitoring of sick and small newborn babies | Included process indicators mSCC, partograph monitoring, and referrals | • QI was closely linked to the 3 other interventions leading to perceived improvements in teamwork, communication and self-efficacy • Adherence to QI meeting frequency and attendance varied, underscoring importance of facilitation and management • Alignment with county and other ongoing implementation/QI efforts was critical to ensure complementarity in activities and resources |