Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of implementation aims

From: A pragmatic implementation research study for In Our DNA SC: a protocol to identify multi-level factors that support the implementation of a population-wide genomic screening initiative in diverse populations

Aim

Quantitative analyses

Qualitative analyses

Analysis unit and method

Primary predictors

Outcomes (RE-AIM)

Aim 1: Monitor participation in In Our DNA SC, identify, and assess factors associated with participant engagement

Analysis unit:

Individual

Analysis method:

All outcomes assessed cross-sectional (weekly reports to leadership) and longitudinally

Demographics:

• Age

• Sex

• Race

• Ethnicity

Collection site

Reach:

• # of eligible individuals reached

• # viewed recruitment message

• # declined

• # non-response

• # expressed interest

• # enrolled

Implementation: Among those enrolled in In Our DNA SC:

• # of samples collected

• # Re-collected

• # Results sent

• Timeliness of return of results

Effectiveness/efficacy:

• Number of people who complete In Our DNA SC

• Positive patients who follow-up with genetic counselor

Maintenance:

• High-risk management of positive patients (number of people visiting genetic counselor who schedule screening)

Participant interviews

• Efficacy: Participant experiences and satisfaction with the program

• Rapid analysis initially to provide necessary information

• Full, in-depth coding using thematic analysis approach

• Participants stratified based on the type of engagement (declined, non-response, enrolled)

Aim 2: Assess contextual factors and strategies that may influence adoption and sustainment of In Our DNA SC among clinical and community sites and ongoing site-specific needs related to program implementation

Analysis unit:

Site

Analysis method:

Bivariate analyses and multivariable linear regression to assess influence of predictors on adoption and maintenance

Use of training materials

Use of community-facing education materials

Implementation site logs (number and type of facilitators and barriers identified)

Research coordinator logs (number and type of question)

Site readiness survey (AIM, IAM, FIM)

Adoption:

• Total number of MUSC and community sites enrolling

• Differences in adoption across SC

Maintenance: Sites that In Our DNA SC is continued

Implementation Site Logs: Rapid deductive qualtiative analysis

Aim 3: Describe facilitators and barriers to implementation and perceptions of In Our DNA SC among work group members

Analysis unit:

Work group, implementation team

Analysis method: Frequency and percent, mean and standard deviation; cross-sectional and longitudinal

Work group logs: Summarize implementation barriers and facilitators by work group and over time

Check-in survey: Summarize perception of program by work group and over time

Work Group Logs: Rapid deductive qualitative analysis

Aim 4: Track adaptations made to In Our DNA SC to assess how mechanisms of change impact key programmatic outcomes

Analysis unit: Program

Analysis method: Summary of type of adaptations made

Implementation:

• Number and type of adaptations made to program over time

All RE-AIM outcomes and whether positive, negative, or no impact

N/A