Author, Year | Measure | Results |
---|---|---|
Low back pain | ||
 Bekkering, 2005 [29] | NRS | Pain improved in both groups over initial 12 weeks Baseline: Intervention 7.0, IQR 5.0–8.0; Control 7.0, IQR 5.0–8.0 6 week: Intervention 3.0, IQR 2.0–5.0; Control 3.0, IQR 2.0–5.0 12 week: Intervention 2.0, IQR 1.0–4.0; Control 2.0, IQR 1.0–4.0 26 week: Intervention 2.0, IQR 1.0–4.0; Control 1.0, IQR 0.0–4.0 52 week: Intervention 2.0, IQR 0.0–4.0; Control 1.0, IQR 0.3–3.0 At 12 weeks: difference in pain intensity was 0.34, (95% CI −0.19 to 0.88) No difference between groups over the 12 months. (X2=6.05, df=4, P>.05) |
 Kongsted, 2019 [32] | NRS | Change Scores baseline to 4 months: Before 0.6 (95%CI −0.05 to 1.3) After 1.9 (95%CI 1.2 to 2.7) GLA:D 1.2 (95%CI 0.6 to 1.7) |
 Lemieux | NRS | Back Pain: Pre-training median 5, (Q1, Q3 3,7) Post-training median 3 (Q1, Q3 1,4) Difference in median −2, P<.001 Leg Pain: Pre-training median 2 (Q1,Q3 0.5,5.0) Post-training median 1 (Q1, Q3 0,3) Difference in median −1, P<.001 |
 Rutten, 2010 [35] | VAS | Association between % Guideline adherence and VAS Average: B = −0.17, Beta= −0.07, P=.499 Correlation of Adherence with VAS Average for Subgroups: Acute −.06, P>.05 Subacute −.14, P>.05 Chronic −.45, P<.01 |
 Sharma, 2019 [26] | PROMIS Pain Intensity (NRS) | PROMIS short form pain intensity: PEG Change 5.28, (95% CI 2.91 to 7.65), P<.001 CG Change 1.72, (95% CI −0.82 to 4.26) P>.05 Between groups: t = 2.16, difference 3.56, (95% CI 0.21 to 6.91),P<.05 PROMIS short form pain interference: PEG Change 4.47, (95% CI 1.191 to 7.04), P<.001 CG Change 3.03, (95% CI 0.69 to 5.36), P<.05 Between groups: t = 0.88, difference 1.45, (95% CI −1.90 to 4.79), P>.05 |
 Schroder, 2021 [23] | NRS | Between-Group Effects Adherent/Nonadherent Care Baseline: Non CPQI 6.3 (5.5 to 7.1) CPQI Adherent 6.1 (5.4 to 6.9) 3 months: Non CPQI Adherent −2.5 (95% CI −3.0 to −2.0) P< .001; CPQI Adherent −3.4 (95% CI −4.0 to −2.8) P< .001; Between-Group Effect 0.9 (95% CI 0.3 to 1.6) P= .004 6 months: Non CPQI Adherent −2.1 (95% CI −2.7 to −1.5) P< .001; CPQI Adherent −3.2 (95% CI −3.8 to −2.6) P< .001; Between-Group Effect 1.1 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.8) P= .002 12 months: Non CPQI Adherent −2.6 (95% CI −3.2 to −2.0) P< .001; CPQI Adherent −3.1 (95% CI −3.7 to −2.5) P< .001; Between-Group Effect 0.5 (95% CI −0.2 to 1.2) P = .169 Between-Group Effects of Control and Intervention Group Baseline: Control 6.1 (5.6 to 6.7), Intervention 6.4 (5.7 to 7.0) 3 months: Control −2.6 (95% CI −3.1 to −2.1) P< .001; Intervention −2.9 (95% CI −3.4 to −2.5) P< .001 Between-Group Effect −0.3 (95% CI −0.3 to 0.9) P = .263 6 months: Control −2.4 (95% CI −3.0 to −1.8) P< .001; Intervention −2.7 (95% CI −3.2 to −2.2) P< .001; Between-Group Effect −0.3 (95% CI −0.3 to 0.9) P = .357 12 months: Control −3.1 (95% CI −3.7 to −2.5) P< .001 Intervention −2.8 (95% CI −3.3 to −2.3) P< .001; Between-Group Effect −0.3 (95% CI −0.9 to 0.3) P = .297 Bonferroni corrected P value of P < .017 |
Acute low back pain | ||
 Fritz, 2007 [17] | NPRS | Adherent vs nonadherent care 22.4% mean difference in improvement, (95% CI 17.5 to 27.3), P<.001 Change in pain rating: All 3.0 (SD 2.7) Adherent 3.6 (SD 2.8) Nonadherent 2.6 (SD 2.7) Percentage change in pain rating, Between groups: P<.05 All 47.1% (SD 43.5) Adherent 60.5% (SD 39.1) Nonadherent 38.0% (SD 44.1) |
 Fritz, 2008 [18] | NPRS | Percent change in pain rating: mean difference 11.3% (95% CI 1.6 to 20.9), P<.05 Adherent 49.1% (SD 45.9) Nonadherent 39.2% (SD 46.8) |
Chronic low back pain | ||
 Van der Roer, 2008 [24] | NRS | No significant difference between groups: −1.02 points; (95% CI −2.14 to 0.09) |
Low back pain with radicular symptoms | ||
 Hahne, 2017 [27] | NRS | All groups improved Back pain: (SMD=standardized mean difference) 5-week NRS: Intervention 3.1(SD 2.2), Control 3.5 (SD 2.5), Adjusted SMD 0.1 (95% −0.4 to 0.6) Adjusted between-group difference 0.2 (95% CI −1.0 to 1.5) P=.72 10-week NRS: Intervention 2.4 (SD 1.6), Control 4.0 (SD 2.6), Adjusted SMD 0.7 (95% CI 0.1 to 1.2), Adjusted between-group difference 1.4 (95% CI 0.2 to 2.7) P=.02 26-week NRS: Intervention 2.4 (SD 1.6), Control 3.5 (SD 2.6), Adjusted SMD 0.4 (95% CI −0.1 to 0.9), Adjusted between-group difference 0.9 (95% CI −0.3 to 2.2) P=.13 52-week NRS: Intervention 2.4 (SD 2.0), Control 3.6 (SD 2.5), Adjusted SMD 0.5 (95% CI −0.1 to 1.0), Adjusted between-group difference 1.1 (95% CI 0.2 to 2.3) P=.9 Leg pain: 5-week NRS: Intervention 3.6 (SD 2.4), Control 4.4 (SD 3.0), Adjusted SMD 0.4 (95% CI −0.2 to 0.9), Adjusted between-group differences 1.0 (95% CI −0.4 to 2.3) P=.16 10-week NRS: Intervention 2.9 (SD 2.3), Control 3.8 (SD 3.0), Adjusted SMD 0.4 (95% CI −0.2 to 0.9), Adjusted between-group difference 1.1 (95% CI −0.3 to 2.4) P=.13 26-week NRS: Intervention 2.0 (SD 2.1), control 3.0 (SD 2.9), Adjusted SMD 0.5 (95% CI −0.1 to 1.0), Adjusted between-group difference 1.2 (95% CI −0.2 to 2.6) P=.09 52-week NRS: Intervention 2.1 (SD 2.4), Control 2.9 (SD 2.8), Adjusted SMD 0.3 (95% CI −0.2 to 0.9), Adjusted between-group difference 0.9 (95% CI −0.5 to 2.3) P=.21 |
Neck Pain | ||
 Cote, 2019 [28] | NRS | NRS improved within all groups but no differences between groups (P>.05) Baseline: Government guideline 5.6 (SD 2.1), Preferred-provider 5.7 (SD 2.0), Education and activation 5.9 (SD 2.1) 6 weeks: Government guideline 2.7 (95% CI 2.1 to 3.3), Preferred-provider 2.2 (95% CI 1.6 to 2.8), GP Education and activation 2.4 (95% CI 1.7 to 3.0) 3 months: Government guideline 3.5 (95% CI 2.9 to 4.0), Preferred-provider 3.3 (95% CI 2.7 to 3.9), GP Education and activation 3.3 (95% CI 2.6 to 3.9) 6 months: Government guideline 3.4 (95% CI 2.8 to 4.1), Preferred-provider 3.2 (95% CI 2.5 to 3.8), GP Education and activation 3.6 (95% CI 3.0 to 4.3) 9 months: Government guideline 3.7 (95% CI 3.1 to 4.3), Preferred-provider 4.0 (95% CI 3.4 to 4.5), GP Education and activation 3.8 (95% CI 3.1 to 4.4) 12 months: Government guideline 3.6 (95% CI 3.0 to 4.2), Preferred-provider 3.2 (95% CI 2.6 to 3.8), GP Education and activation 3.6 (95% CI 2.9 to 4.2) |
 Horn, 2016 [19] | NPRS | The nonadherent group demonstrated greater percentage improvement in pain. P=.01 Adherent 7.04 (95% CI −11.73 to 25.70) Nonadherent 33.11 (95% CI 25.99 to 40.22) |