Quantifying implementation strategy and dissemination channel preferences and experiences for pain management in primary care: a novel implementer-reported outcome

Table 5 Categorical concordance

Cohen’s kappa (κ)	Categorical interpretation	Dissemination concordance n (%) [M]	Implementation concordance n (%) [M]
−1	Perfect disagreement
−0.81 to −0.99	Near perfect disagreement
−0.61 to −0.80	Substantial disagreement
−0.41to −0.60	Moderate disagreement	2 (2.0) [−0.47]
−0.21 to −0.40	Fair disagreement	3 (3.0) [−0.29]	6 (5.9) [−0.30]
−0.10 to −0.20	Slight disagreement	2 (2.0) [−0.15]	8 (7.9) [−0.15]
−0.09–0.09	No different from chance	5 (4.9) [0.01]	24 (23.8) [0.03]
0.10–0.20	Slight agreement	10 (9.9) [0.13]	23 (22.8) [0.15]
0.21–0.40	Fair agreement	20 (19.8) [0.31]	25 (24.7) [0.29]
0.41–0.60	Moderate agreement	24 (23.8) [0.51]	9 (8.9) [0.50]
0.61–0.80	Substantial agreement	19 (18.8) [0.70]	3 (3.0) [0.65]
0.81–0.99	Near perfect agreement	14 (13.9) [0.88]	1 (1.0) [0.85]
1	Perfect agreement	2 (2.0) [1.0]	2 (2.0) [1.0]

Table 5 shows the seven-level categorization of Cohen’s kappa (κ) at the individual level. Dissemination and implementation concordance were calculated for each participant and categorized. We reported the number of participants, the percent of total, and average for each category

ISSN: 2662-2211