Skip to main content

Table 3 Descriptive data from surveys

From: Formative evaluation prior to implementation of a brief treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder in primary care

Measure

Response format

Item content

Subscale

M (SD)

All Participants (N = 22)

Implementation climate scale (ICS) (5 items, 0–4 scale)

Evaluative (not at all to a very great extent)

Assessment of agreement with statements reflecting three organizational climate dimensions of innovation use (answered by those in primary care and IBH)

Focus on EBT

2.78 (0.62)

Educational support for EBT

2.59 (0.94)

Recognition for EBT

2.22 (0.85)

Rewards for EBT

0.85 (0.71)

Selection for EBT

1.78 (1.05)

Selection for openness

2.41 (0.81)

   

Overall

2.09 (0.81)

Levels of integration measure (LIM) (5 items, 1–5 scale)

Evaluative (strongly disagree to strongly agree)

Assessment of integration between PCPs and IBH clinicians (answered by those in primary care and IBH)

Integrated clinical practice

3.47 (0.62)

Systems integration

3.23 (0.38)

Training

3.20 (0.71)

Relationships

3.76 (0.60)

Shared decision making

3.26 (0.63)

Beliefs and commitment

4.23 (0.45)

Leadership

3.70 (0.89)

   

Overall

3.51 (0.37)

IBH-level participants (N = 13; 11 potential interventionists, 2 behavioral health leadership)

Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS-15) (15 items, 0–4 scale)

Evaluative (Not At All to A Very Great Extent)

Assessment of agreement with attitudes towards EBTs (answered by those in IBH)

Requirements

2.64 (1.34)

Appeal

3.04 (1.08)

Openness

2.67 (0.72)

Divergence

2.81 (0.74)

   

Overall

2.80 (0.72)

  1. PCP Primary care physician, IBH Integrated behavioral health, EBT Evidence-based treatment. Joint display of survey results with qualitatively derived codes for evaluation of integration and organizational climate among primary care and IBH