Skip to main content

Table 4 Participant responsiveness to the ACT SMART Implementation Toolkit in aggregate and by individual agency implementation team

From: Fidelity to the ACT SMART Toolkit: an instrumental case study of implementation strategy fidelity

 

Aggregate

Median

Agency 1

Median

Agency 2

Median

Agency 3a

Median

Agency 4

Median

Agency 5

Median

Agency 6

Median

Overall Participant Responsiveness Scores

3.8

3.8

4.8

3.1

3.8

4.3

3.8

Phase 1: Exploration

3.8

4

4

3.25

3.5

5

3

Phase 2: Adoption

3.5

3.5

5

3.0a

3.5

4.5

3.5

Phase 3: Preparation

4.0

3.5

4.5

 

4.0

4.0

4.0

Phase 4: Implementation

5.0

5

5

 

4.0

4.0

5

  1. Participant responsiveness scoring ranges from 1 (Not at all engaged) to 5 (Extremely engaged). N = 6 implementation teams
  2. aAgency implementation team made the decision to not adopt an EBP, therefore, did not progress past Phase 2