Table 1 VAMC characteristics overall and by adoption status
Total (n = 63) | Non-adopters (n = 12) | Adopters (n = 51) | Adopter sub-categories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Late adopters + laggardsa (n = 26) | Innovators + early adopters + early majorityb (n = 25) | Innovators + early adoptersc (n = 8) | ||||
Organizational readiness, median (IQR) | ||||||
ORIC change commitment | 4.40 (1.60) | 4.50 (1.2) | 4.40 (1.60) | 3.90 (1.60) | 4.60 (1.00) | 4.90 (1.40) |
ORIC change efficacy | 3.71 (0.86) | 3.79 (0.79) | 3.71 (1.00) | 3.71 (1.00) | 3.85 (0.71) | 4.43 (1.07) |
Facility complexity level, n (%) | ||||||
1—high complexity | 29 (46) | 5 (42) | 24 (47) | 12 (46) | 12 (48) | 3 (38) |
2—medium complexity | 16 (25) | 2 (17) | 14 (27) | 6 (23) | 8 (32) | 3 (38) |
3–low complexityd | 18 (28) | 4 (33) | 13 (25) | 8 (31) | 5 (20) | 2 (25) |
CSP staff, median (IQR) | ||||||
Total staffing | 9 (4) | 10 (8) | 9 (4) | 9 (4) | 9 (2) | 8 (5) |
CSP unique applications, median (IQR) | 339 (388) | 292 (510) | 341 (381) | 372 (393) | 315 (245) | 320 (195) |
Geographic region, n (%) | ||||||
West | 8 (13) | 1 (8) | 7 (14) | 5 (19) | 2 (8) | 1 (13) |
Midwest | 17 (27) | 2 (17) | 15 (29) | 8 (31) | 7 (28) | 2 (25) |
Northeast | 15 (24) | 5 (42) | 10 (20) | 2 (8) | 8 (32) | 4 (50) |
South | 23 (37) | 4 (33) | 19 (37) | 11 (42) | 8 (32) | 1 (13) |
Rural facility, n (%) | 7 (11) | 2 (17) | 5 (10) | 2 (8) | 3 (12) | 1 (13) |