Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinic characteristics, by PrEP implementation status

From: Using qualitative comparative analysis to understand the conditions that produce successful PrEP implementation in family planning clinics

 

Total

(N = 38)

n (%)

PrEP

(N = 11)

n (%)

Non-PrEP

(N = 27)

n (%)

Urbanicity

 Urban

28 (74)

9 (82)

19 (70)

 Rural

10 (36)

2 (18)

8 (30)

Clinic type

 Health department

22 (58)

4 (36)

18 (67)

 Family planning

4 (11)

3 (27)

1 (4)

 FQHC/community clinic

10 (26)

4 (36)

6 (22)

 Hospital

2 (5)

0 (0)

2 (7)

Regiona

 Mid-Atlantic

16 (42)

6 (55)

10 (37)

 Southeast

14 (37)

2 (18)

12 (44)

 Southwest

8 (21)

3 (27)

5 (19)

Primary care

 Yes

12 (32)

4 (36)

8 (30)

 No

26 (68)

7 (64)

19 (70)

Percent poverty, mean (min, max)b

17 (6, 27)

17 (6,21)

17 (7, 27)

Percent uninsured, mean (min, max)b

11 (4, 21)

11 (4, 21)

11 (5, 18)

HIV prevalence rate, mean (min, max)b

669 (55, 2590)

696 (57, 2590)

658 (55, 2307)

  1. aDepartment of Health and Human Services regions Mid-Atlantic (Washington D.C., Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia), Southeast (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee), and Southwest (Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas)
  2. bBased on AIDSVu 2015 data from clinic’s county