Skip to main content

Table 5 Intervention description, type and reported effectiveness

From: Effectiveness of de-implementation strategies for low-value prescribing in secondary care: a systematic review

Study

Verbatim intervention description

(Page number and section)

Type of intervention

Reported as effective

Daley et al., 2018 [35]

“modified reporting of positive urine cultures”

(p814, Introduction)

Single

Yes

Metlay et al., 2007 [37]

“multidimensional educational intervention”

(p223, Interventions)

Multi-faceted

Yes

Moja et al., 2019 [38]

“Medilogy Decision Support System”

(p3, Development of CDSS)

Single

Yes

Paul et al., 2006 [39]

“computerized decision support system for antibiotic treatment”

(p1238, Abstract)

Single

Yes

Terrell et al., 2009 [40]

“computer assisted decision support”

(p1388, Abstract)

Single

Yes

Terrell et al., 2010 [41]

“decision support in a computerized physician order entry system”

(p623, Abstract)

Single

Yes

Menya et al., 2015 [36]

“facility-directed, performance based incentives”

(p4, Incentive Intervention)

Single

Yes

Franchi et al., 2016 [43]

“e-learning program teaching CGA [Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment] and basic geriatric pharmacological notions”

(p53, Abstract)

Multi-faceted

No

Opondo et al., 2011 [44]

“multi-faceted quality improvement intervention”

(p1, Title)

Multi-faceted

No

van de Maat et al., 2020 [42]

“a validated clinical prediction model (Feverkidstool) was implemented as a decision rule guiding antibiotic prescription.”

(p6, Intervention)

Single

No

Yadav et al., 2019 [45]

“stewardship intervention that additionally incorporates behavioral nudges”

(p719, Abstract)

Multi-faceted

No