Table 6 Top two and bottom two scoring items for each NPT construct
NPT construct | Construct definition | Item | % agree and strongly agree |
|---|---|---|---|
Collective action (12 items) | The work that is needed as a group to make obstetric triage work | I have easily integrated obstetric triage into my everyday work | 91.7% |
Staff believe that they have the ability to do obstetric triage | 86.7% | ||
There are regular reviews, or refresher trainings, of the obstetric triage process | 65.0% | ||
There is an established process for replenishing triage bands | 55.0% | ||
Cognitive participation (7 items) | Level of commitment and engagement by implementers | Staff believe that participating in obstetric triage is part of their role as health providers | 96.7% |
Obstetric triage will continue to be part of my everyday work in caring for mothers | 93.3% | ||
Staff believe that there are opportunities to discuss implementation challenges and best practices with peers and champions | 66.7% | ||
Staff believe that there are regular reviews of obstetric triage practices by coaches | 66.7% | ||
Coherence (4 items) | Meaning and purpose of obstetric triage to staff | I believe that obstetric triage has resulted in improved outcomes for mothers in my hospital | 96.7% |
Staff see the value of obstetric triage in their work | 93.3% | ||
Staff have a shared understanding of the purpose of obstetric triage | 90.0% | ||
Staff believe that obstetric triage differs from how we prioritized high risk mothers in the past | 50.0% | ||
Reflexive monitoring (10 items) | Participants’ appraisal of obstetric triage | Obstetric triage will continue to be a normal part of work in my hospital in the future | 95.0% |
Staff believe that obstetric triage is a normal part of our work | 95.0% | ||
Staff are aware of reports or data about the effectiveness of obstetric triage | 68.3% | ||
There is a process for selecting and training new champions | 35.0% |