Skip to main content

Table 3 Diffusion and dissemination activities (n = 117)a

From: Researchers’ views on and practices of knowledge translation: an international survey of transfusion medicine researchers

Activities to disseminate research findings

Median (IQR)

Level of engagement, n (%)

Never

Rarely/occasionally

Frequently/always

Missing

Diffusion activities

 Publishing in peer-reviewed journals

4 (3–5)

3 (2.6)

28 (23.9)

86 (73.5)

 Presenting at an academic conference

4 (3–5)

2 (1.7)

31 (26.5)

84 (71.8)

 Detailed research reports

3 (2–4)

12 (10.3)

53 (45.3)

50 (42.7)

2 (1.7)

Dissemination activities

 Developing new educational materials

3 (2–4)

12 (10.3)

70 (59.8)

34 (29.1)

1 (0.9)

 Writing plain language summaries

3 (2–4)

10 (8.5)

71 (60.7)

35 (29.9)

1 (0.9)

 Organising an interactive small group meeting/workshop

3 (2–4)

13 (11.1)

71 (60.7)

32 (27.4)

1 (0.9)

 Preparing a policy or an evidence brief and disseminating it to relevant audiences (e.g. policymakers, health service providers, or administrators)

3 (2–3)

12 (10.3)

83 (70.9)

21 (17.9)

1 (0.9)

 Creating networks or networking with end-users such as policymakers and practitioners (e.g. give presentations to relevant networks)

3 (2–3)

24 (20.5)

75 (64.1)

18 (15.4)

 Engage champions or opinion leaders (e.g. directors, managers) to assist with sharing of research findings

2 (2–3)

19 (16.2)

78 (66.7)

20 (17.1)

 Engaging with social media (e.g. Facebook, Twitter)

2 (1–3)

35 (29.9)

61 (52.1)

20 (17.1)

1 (0.9)

 Organising a media release/outreach campaign

2 (1–3)

48 (41.0)

57 (48.7)

8 (6.8)

4 (3.4)

  1. aRated as never (1) to always (5). For frequencies, “frequently” and “always”, and “rarely” and “occasionally” were pooled together