Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariable model of COM-B domain statements associated with the likelihood of stopping ADT overuse

From: Unpacking overuse of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer to inform de-implementation strategies

Survey statements

TDF domain

COM-B domain(s)

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)

p-value

I find patients are worried about the effect stopping ADT will have on their cancer

Beliefs about consequences

Motivation–Reflective (provider)

Opportunity–Social (patient)

0.22 (0.05–0.79)

0.03

I want to give ADT recommendations consistent with those of my peers

Social influence

Opportunity–Social (provider)

0.12 (0.01–0.67)

0.04

I have concerns about side effects and castration resistance in patients with long-term use of ADT

Beliefs about consequences

Motivation–Reflective

2.42 (0.60–9.95)

0.21

I put a lot of weight on guideline recommendations regarding use of ADT as monotherapy (e.g., AUA or NCCN)

Environmental resources

Opportunity–Physical

2.73 (0.50–15.90)

0.24

I do not have adequate time for discussion about ADT

Environmental resources

Opportunity–Physical

2.82 (0.31–65.40)

0.41

I find talking about stopping ADT challenging

Skills–interpersonal

Capability–Psychological

2.03 (0.35–14.30)

0.44

I like to consider options other than ADT to manage patients with localized prostate cancer (e.g., definitive treatment, watchful waiting)

Knowledge

Capability–Psychological

1.00 (0.01–100)

0.99