Skip to main content

The CircumVent Project: a CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation using an implementation research framework

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Acute respiratory failure, a major cause of death in COVID-19, is managed with high-flow oxygen therapy via invasive mechanical ventilation. In resource-limited settings like Nigeria, the shortage of ventilators and oxygen supply makes this option challenging. Evidence-based non-invasive alternatives to mechanical ventilation such as the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices exist, but there have been concerns that non-invasive ventilation may expose healthcare workers to infection from aerosolized dispersion of SARS-CoV-2. We propose to evaluate the feasibility, adaptability and acceptability of a CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation among patients with COVID-19 and health workers in eight COVID-19 treatment and isolation centers in Nigeria.

Methods

The study will occur in 4 stages: (1) convene a Steering Committee of key stakeholders and recruit implementation sites; (2) use the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARiHS) framework to guide a needs assessment of treatment centers’ capacity to use high-flow oxygen therapy to treat COVID-19 patients and utilize the findings to develop an implementation strategy for the use of a CPAP/O2 helmet solution; (3) build infrastructure to support training and data monitoring processes and to develop implementation protocols to evaluate the adaptability of the strategy for the use of the CPAP/O2 helmet; and (4) train health workers, distribute a CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation, pilot test the implementation strategy, and assess feasibility of its use and acceptability that includes monitoring altered risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers.

Discussion

The CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation in Nigeria can serve as a scalable model for resource-poor countries, and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, has the potential to be deployed for the treatment of pneumonia and other respiratory diseases.

Trial registration

NCT04929691. Registered June 18, 2021—retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04929691

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to surge across the globe, with more than 175 million persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 and causing over 2.6 million deaths, mostly due to acute respiratory failure [1]. With more than 89,000 deaths across sub-Saharan Africa, evidence-based just-in-time strategies that address acute shortage of ventilators and oxygen supply are in dire need, especially in countries like Nigeria, which accounts for over 20% of Africa’s population. Fortunately, the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices for non-invasive ventilation is an evidence-based alternative to mechanical ventilation [2,3,4,5]. CPAP and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) devices have been used in the management of patients with COVID-19 [6] and have inherent advantages, especially when intensive care resources are unavailable. CPAP and BiPAP machines can maintain positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at 25 cmH2O and up to 50 l/min for FiO2 up to 95% with an appropriate patient circuit using supplemental oxygen flow [7]. When used with an oxygen helmet (O2 helmet), non-invasive ventilation (i) protects the treatment environment and healthcare workers from dispersion of the virus, (ii) improves outcomes [8], and (iii) reduces the need for mechanical ventilation [9]. CPAP devices can also run on 12 V DC, making them adaptable to battery use with solar-charging capability, an important consideration for low-income countries. CPAP devices are affordable, costing about 300 USD (1% the cost of a mechanical ventilator) and can readily be sourced from the approximately 3 million devices that are unused in U.S. homes to circumvent supply chain limits.

While randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with BiPAP/O2 helmet use over face masks in reducing the need for endotracheal ventilation treatment of ARDS [10], CPAP/O2 helmet use has not been evaluated in low-resource settings like Nigeria, where mechanical ventilation is in limited supply, and oxygen as well as continuous electrical power supply is erratic. In response to this need, we established the CircumVent Project (www.circumventproject.com), a group of engineers, scientists, and clinicians, to develop a strategy to reduce the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and provide cost-effective alternative approaches for NIV in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The CircumVent Project will evaluate the feasibility of the CPAP/ O2 helmet solution using an implementation research framework that permits the exploration of the environment, the policy gaps, and the practice capacity for this non-invasive ventilation option in Nigeria. In this article, we describe the CircumVent Project as a potentially scalable model that can be implemented for large-scale deployment of CPAP/O2 helmets for non-invasive ventilation in Nigeria and other LMICs.

Methods

Study setting

The study will be conducted in eight COVID-19 treatment and isolation centers in Nigeria. The sites were selected based on availability of COVID-19 treatment services, geographic spread and patient volume. The eight sites are as follows: Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital; Delta State University Teaching Hospital; Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta; Federal Medical Centre, Ebute Metta, Lagos; Lagos University Teaching Hospital; University College Hospital, Ibadan; University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital; and Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital.

Study aims

1: Convene a Steering Committee of key stakeholders and recruit implementation sites to provide oversight for the development of processes for communication, decision-making, coordination, and distribution of CPAP/O2 helmet solutions for non-invasive ventilation at the eight COVID-19 treatment and isolation centers.

2: Use the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARiHS) framework to guide needs assessment, perform stakeholder analysis of the treatment centers’ capacity to use high-flow oxygen therapy to treat COVID-19 patients, and use the findings to develop a context-specific, practice facilitation strategy to implement the CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation.

3: Build infrastructure to support training and data monitoring processes and develop implementation protocols to evaluate the adaptability of the strategy for implementing use of CPAP/O2 helmets for non-invasive ventilation.

4: (a) Train healthcare workers; distribute a CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation, pilot test the practice facilitation [implementation] strategy, and assess feasibility of its use and acceptability; (b) estimate the altered risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers associated with the use of CPAP/O2 helmets for non-invasive ventilation.

Study design

The study will be performed in four phases: (1) assessment of the implementation climate (supply chain, distribution capacity, training); (2) deployment of CPAP/O2 helmet kits to each of the eight COVID-19 treatment centers in Nigeria and Training-of-Trainers (physicians) on the use of the CPAP/O2 helmet for the management of acute respiratory distress. The trainers will subsequently train non-physician personnel at their facilities on the use of the equipment; (3) assessment of acceptability of the CPAP/O2 helmets by physicians involved in the management of COVID-19 patients, and (4) assessment of change in the prevalence of COVID-19 infection among health care workers due to use of CPAP/O2 helmets for respiratory therapy.

Conceptual framework

We will evaluate the feasibility of a CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation using the i-PARiHS framework. The core constructs of the framework include facilitation, innovation, recipients, and context, with implementation facilitation as the active element that integrates the other constructs. i-PARiHS posits that successful implementation of a program is specified in terms of the achievement of its goals, which results from facilitation of an innovation with the recipients and their context (local, organizational and health system) in which the program is being implemented [11]. i-PARiHS will guide the planning of the proposed study in 4 steps: practice capacity assessment, training, distribution, and user testing. Because scale up of an evidence-based program requires expertise to facilitate multilevel system changes [12], and LMICs often lack such expertise, we will use i-PARiHS to explore factors and support systems required for the successful use of CPAP/O2 helmets for non-invasive ventilation at the eight COVID-19 treatment centers in Nigeria.

Study procedures

Treatment protocol for the CPAP/O2 helmet system

The treatment protocol was designed in line with World Health Organization (WHO) and Nigerian national COVID-19 treatment guidelines. The patient interface is a low-cost Subsalve (North Kingstown, RI) oxygen helmet that can protect healthcare workers from viral exposure when used with disposable inspiratory and expiratory 22-mm viral filters (Fig. 1). The tubing and helmet can be sterilized in a variety of ways [13], including using low-cost steramine that is proven effective against SARS-CoV-2. The viral filters will prevent aerosolizing the SARS-CoV-2 virus and infecting healthcare providers for COVID-19 patients. Importantly, the oxygen helmet solves a problem that has contributed to the intubation of patients for mechanical ventilation, when NIV was also a feasible treatment [14,15,16].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patient circuit 1. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation

Convening of Steering Committee (specific aim 1)

The membership of the Steering Committee will be drawn from the Presidential Task Force on COVID-19; the Nigeria Ministry of Health, Directors of the COVID-19 Treatment and Isolation Centers, and the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC). The Steering Committee will (1) identify the capacity of the eight COVID-19 treatment centers to use the CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation through stakeholder engagement, and (2) develop a context-specific practice facilitation strategy for use of the CPAP/O2 helmet kits in local hospitals. The Steering Committee will meet every 3 months (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Timeline of project activities

Implementation Committee

The Implementation Committee is comprised of medical directors/representatives of five of the eight COVID-19 isolation and treatment centers in Nigeria. The committee oversees implementation of the project including (a) identifying practice capacity of all eight COVID-19 treatment centers, (b) establishing a manual of procedures and data collection processes, (c) finalizing plans for program evaluation, and (d) testing the feasibility and acceptability of using the CPAP/O2 helmet solutions for NIV in COVID-19 patients. The Implementation Committee has been meeting weekly since June 2020 and since January 2021, meeting monthly.

Needs assessment (specific aim 2)

The structured needs assessment will explore treatment procedures for management of acute respiratory failure at the COVID-19 treatment centers, document staffing, staff characteristics (professional designation, training, experience), workload, facility characteristics (infrastructure, relevant supplies, oxygen supply), and service organization. The Steering Committee will employ findings from the needs assessment to refine all metrics to reflect usability of the measures and maintain scientific rigor.

We will use qualitative interviews and domains of i-PARiHS, to understand the context, barriers, and facilitators of implementing the CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation and contextual features of the COVID-19 treatment centers that will enable its implementation. These interviews will explore the following: (1) evidence of the likely fit of the treatment centers for use of the CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation; (2) the recipients and key stakeholders likely to be involved with implementing the use of a CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation in management of acute respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients, with a focus on the barriers that may influence its implementation; (3) context, resources and leadership support likely to influence acceptability and adaptability of the CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation; and (4) facilitation and the factors likely to enable recipients’ acceptability of the CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation.

Data will be collected from 16 physicians attending the CircumVent training who were selected from the participating health facilities. An interview guide will be developed, piloted, and used for the interviews. Participants will be contacted to schedule a convenient time for their interviews. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted in the English language. The opened-ended questions will allow the participants to express their opinions and share their experiences in the use of the CircumVent equipment, and suggestfactors that could promote or inhibit the use of the equipment. Prompts will be used to encourage participants to provide insight. Each interview will be audio-recorded. Each qualitative interview will last about 45 min. These data will inform development of the context-specific practice facilitation strategy.

Building infrastructure to support training and data monitoring processes and developing implementation protocols to evaluate adaptability (specific aim 3)

CircumVent leadership at the Nigeria Institute of Medical Research (NIMR) will lead this effort with guidance from the Implementation Committee. Proposed training and protocols will be developed based on the medical device training manuals from the manufacturer and adapted to the context of Nigeria. The Implementation Committee will apply needs assessment findings to the adaptation of existing protocols and refine existing materials. The Implementation Committee will also work with the NCDC to convene a cadre of trainers, whose sole purpose is to train health workers on the appropriate use of the CPAP/O2 helmets. These trainers will serve as coaches and provide support, knowledge exchange, and performance feedback to health workers using the CPAP/O2 helmets. Products from this phase will include training manuals, curricula, and standard operating procedures for the practice facilitation strategy and the use of the CPAP/O2 helmet kits.

Recruitment of implementation sites, health worker training, CPAP/O2 helmet distribution, pilot testing of practice facilitation strategy, and assessment of feasibility and acceptability (specific aim 4 a).

All eight COVID-19 treatment centers will be recruited for the proposed study.

Training of health workers to use the CPAP/O2 helmets for non-invasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients. Health workers will be trained on the components of the CPAP/O2 helmets, including the treatment, operation and cleaning protocols. The initial training will occur over 2 days, followed by a 1-day step-down and booster training sessions every 4 months over 1 year. Day 1 will focus on familiarizing workers with the CPAP device settings, understand and interpret oximeter readings, and general device maintenance. Day 2 will focus on training about the patient circuit, the logic of the tubing, and how to interface and work with the oxygen helmet, especially fitting it comfortably and effectively. The healthcare workers will have the opportunity to practice acquired skills via role playing and modeling with feedback, as well as review of the training materials.

Training evaluation. A baseline assessment will be done to evaluate the knowledge of the physician on the management of ARDS using the CPAP/O2 helmet. After the 2 days training, a post-training assessment will be done to evaluate the uptake of knowledge provided. The percentage improvement in knowledge will be used to determine the degree of uptake.

Distribution of devices. The Steering Committee will coordinate the distribution of devices using the feedback received from the stakeholder engagement. This distribution will consist of the following steps: (1) purchasing and transporting the CPAP/O2 helmet kits to Nigeria; (2) working with NIMR and the Nigerian Ministry of Health for the clearance of the devices through customs, their secure storage in Nigeria, and developing the protocol for disbursing the CPAP/O2 helmets to the treatment sites; and (3) NIMR will disburse the kits to the treatment centers and monitor their use.

Practice facilitation strategy. A practice facilitation strategy will be tailored to the needs of the eight treatment centers. Key stakeholders in the healthcare system (physicians, respiratory therapists, ICU doctors and ICU nurses) will take part in user testing of the developed practice facilitation strategy. For this purpose, the health workers who are expected to implement the use of the CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation will respond to a series of questions to explore the aspects of the devices and their implementation that are difficult to understand and probe their comprehension of the nature of the challenges.

Training of practice facilitators using a train-the-trainer model. After recruitment of practice facilitators, a “kick off” learning session will review components of the CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation and its protocol, quality improvement methods, the study timeline, and evaluation plan with the practice facilitators. Following this session, the key investigators and a pulmonologist will conduct a 2-day [train-the-trainer] training with them, followed by 1-day booster session after 4 months during the project implementation. The training will cover three core competencies of practice facilitation: data use to drive improvement, interpersonal skills, and quality improvement [17]. The training will help the facilitators achieve competencies in practice facilitation techniques such as effective communication skills, problem solving, promoting teamwork, consensus building, and goal setting. The training will combine didactic sessions with case-based learning, with booster sessions. The facilitators will serve as coaches, provide support, knowledge exchange, and performance feedback to the treatment centers.

Is the use of the CPAP/oxygen helmet associated with a greater risk of COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers? (specific aim 4 b)

Healthcare personnel are at increased risk of acquiring COVID-19 infection [18]. Studies of other respiratory pathogens have documented increased transmission risk associated with aerosol generating procedures (AGP), many of which can generate both large droplets and small particle aerosols. Non-invasive ventilation is considered an AGP, but it is postulated that helmet ventilation may be associated with less risk of transmission of respiratory pathogens via aerosolization given containment in the helmet and negligible air dispersion.

A case-control study design will be implemented. We will enroll clinical and environmental hospital staff who have exposure to SARS-CoV-2 via provision of direct patient care or environmental care at the eight CircumVent study sites. Consenting and eligible health care workers will complete baseline testing for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and complete an exposure assessment form summarizing risk factors and potential COVID-19 exposures in the prior 1 month. All healthcare workers assessed at time 0 comprise the retrospective study cohort. Individuals who test negative for COVID-19 antibodies at time 0 will be invited to participate in the prospective study. They will be followed for up to 6 months during which they will complete monthly encounter forms to assess community and healthcare-related exposures and to document any PCR-confirmed diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the study will be censored and exit interview and a second sample for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies will be obtained if and when COVID-19 vaccine becomes available at the designated COVID-19 treatment centers.

In the retrospective study, a case is defined by seropositivity to SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, and a control is defined by seronegativity to SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. In the prospective study, a case is defined by seropositivity to SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, or a clinical case of SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by PCR testing, and a control is defined by the absence of infection, either by SARS-CoV-2 PCR or SARS-CoV2 specific antibodies.

Implementation outcomes

  • Feasibility is the extent to which the CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation can be successfully used within the Nigeria setting. We will employ mixed methods to measure feasibility from the patient and provider perspectives using in-depth-interviews (providers), structured case report forms assessing the fit/comfort of the helmet/CPAP device (patients), and any oxygen supply issues (for each case). We will also use the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), a 4-item instrument with a 5-point ordinal scale “completely disagree” to “completely agree” that takes less than 5 min to complete [19].

  • Adaptability of the strategy for implementing the use of a CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation will be measured using a qualitative research approach, with focus on assessing the process of change, what providers want to change (ideal), what they need to have changed (essential), and what is adapted in the end (reality).

  • Acceptability is the perception among implementation stakeholders that the CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive management of COVID-19 is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory to patients and providers. We will assess acceptability of the use of the CPAP/O2 helmet solution from the patient and provider perspectives using in-depth-interviews (providers), structured case report forms assessing the fit/comfort of the helmet/CPAP device (patients), and any oxygen supply issues (for each case). We will also administer the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) to providers [19]. The instrument includes four items with a 5-point ordinal scale that ranges from “completely disagree” to “completely agree,”—higher scores indicate greater acceptability.

Data analysis

Qualitative data analysis

Data collected will be transcribed verbatim after the interviews [20]. Data from the interviews will be transcribed and coded using open coding to develop an initial codebook by the qualitative research team. The codebook will include a list of question prompts, initial codes, and code meanings. Adopting Braun and Clarke’s six steps approach, codes will be reviewed, compared, analyzed, and sorted into categories to reflect consistent and overarching themes [21]. The team will develop a coding tree to derive themes until thematic saturation is attained [20,21,22,23].

Quantitative data analysis

Both the retrospective and nested prospective case-control studies will compare differences in exposures and risk factors observed between cases and controls using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. All tests will use 2-tailed probability, with P values < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Variables that are statistically significant will be included in forward logistic regression analysis to arrive at independent measures of association.

Discussion

The COVID-19 pandemic will subside, but its effect on health systems will likely linger, particularly for African countries whose healthcare infrastructure is vulnerable. In this paper, we describe a non-invasive ventilation approach to management of COVID-19 in Nigeria using CPAP/O2 helmets. There are three key strengths in this study. First, this study uses a well-established implementation science framework (I-PARiHS) to assess the implementation climate, explore factors and support systems required for successful implementation of CPAP/O2 helmet solutions for non-invasive ventilation and to develop an evidence-based implementation strategy (practice facilitation) for the use of the helmets across eight COVID-19 treatment centers in Nigeria. Whereas extant literature in LMICs show that the uptake of evidence-based interventions is a desired implementation research outcome, there is limited evidence of interventions targeted at addressing care of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure in Africa. Second, if successfully implemented, findings from this study will serve as pilot data for scaling up this strategy in other LMICs. The proposed project is in a position to collaborate with other groups to provide technology platforms to deliver training and support resources. Finally, the innovation that will be derived from the sourcing and using of these CPAP/O2 helmet solutions for non-invasive ventilation in Nigeria will serve as a model to other countries in Africa. The CPAP/O2 helmets can also be a major treatment for childhood pneumonia, the number one killer of children in low-income countries like Nigeria [24].

Availability of data and materials

The study PI and key investigators will have access to all data. Data access to other researchers will be considered on a case-by-case basis, upon reasonable request.

Change history

  • 05 September 2021

    Figure 1 included information not intended to be published. The article has been updated to remove this information.

Abbreviations

CPAP:

Continuous positive airway pressure

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2

NIMR:

Nigeria Institute for Medical Research

NCDC:

Nigeria Center for Disease Control

O2 :

Oxygen

i-PARiHS:

Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services

LMIC:

Low- and middle-income countries

References

  1. WHO. Weekly epidemiological update - 15 June 2021. Emergency situational updates. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19---15-june-2021 Accessed June 20, 2021.

  2. Cabore JW, Karamagi HC, Kipruto H, Asamani JA, Droti B, Seydi ABW, et al. The potential effects of widespread community transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the World Health Organization African Region: a predictive model. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(5):e002647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002647.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Beitler JR, Owens RL, Malhotra A. Unmasking a role for noninvasive ventilation in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA. 2016;315(22):2401–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.5987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Brambilla AM, Aliberti S, Prina E, Nicoli F, Forno MD, Nava S, et al. Helmet CPAP vs. oxygen therapy in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(7):942–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3325-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiumello D, Brochard L, Marini JJ, et al. Respiratory support in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: an expert opinion. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Delclaux C, L'Her E, Alberti C, Mancebo J, Abroug F, Conti G, et al. Treatment of acute hypoxemic nonhypercapnic respiratory insufficiency with continuous positive airway pressure delivered by a face mask: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000;284(18):2352–60. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.18.2352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. MSHS. Repurposing bi-level ventilators for use with intubated patients while minimizing risk to health care works during insufficient supply of conventional ventilation for patients with COVID-19. 2020; http://researchroadmap.mssm.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Home-Bi-level-to-Vent-Modification-Protocol-v2.1.pdf. Accessed July 5, 2020.

  8. MSHS. COVID-19 Research Guidance for MSHS. 2020; http://researchroadmap.mssm.edu/reference/covid-19-guidance/#ventilator-repurpose. Accessed June 29, 2020.

  9. Liu Q, Gao Y, Chen R, Cheng Z. Noninvasive ventilation with helmet versus control strategy in patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):265. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1449-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel BK, Wolfe KS, Pohlman AS, Hall JB, Kress JP. Effect of noninvasive ventilation delivered by helmet vs face mask on the rate of endotracheal intubation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(22):2435–41. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.6338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Harvey G, Kitson A. PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci. 2015;11(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0398-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Allen CG, Brownstein JN, Satsangi A, Escoffery C. Community health workers as allies in hypertension self-management and medication adherence in the United States, 2014. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;13:e179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. New York State Registered Disinfectants Based on EPA List https://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/materials_minerals_pdf/covid19.pdf Accessed June 20, 2021.

  14. Simonds A, Hanak A, Chatwin M, Morrell M, Hall A, Parker KH, et al. Evaluation of droplet dispersion during non-invasive ventilation, oxygen therapy, nebuliser treatment and chest physiotherapy in clinical practice: implications for management of pandemic influenza and other airborne infections. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(46):131–72. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta14460-02.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hui D, Chow B, Lo T, Tsang O, Ko F, Ng S. Exhaled air dispersion during high-flow nasal cannula therapy versus CPAP via different masks. Eur Respir J. 2019;53(4):1802339. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02339-2018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hui DS, Chow BK, Lo T, Ng SS, Ko FW, Gin T, et al. Exhaled air dispersion during noninvasive ventilation via helmets and a total facemask. Chest. 2015;147(5):1336–43. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-1934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fryar CD, Ostchega Y, Hales CM, Zhang G, Kruszon-Moran D. Hypertension prevalence and control among adults: United States, 2015-2016. NCHS data brief. 2017;289:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Calò F, Russo A, Camaioni C, De Pascalis S, Coppola N. Burden, risk assessment, surveillance and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in health workers: a scoping review. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9(1):139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-020-00756-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, et al. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bowling A. Research Methods in Health. 4th ed. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Braun V, Clarke V, Weate P. Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research. In: Smith B, Sparkes AC, editors. Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise. London: Routledge; 2016. p. 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guest G, Namey E, Chen M. A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: sampling, data collection and analysis. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wonodi C, Obi-Jeff C, Falade A, Watkins K, Omokore OA. Pneumonia in Nigeria: the way forward. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55(Suppl 1):S5–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the 40+ volunteers who worked to develop the concept of the CPAP/O2Helmet system within the Ventilator Project (www.ventilatorproject.org), especially John Gridley who guided and helped the team to navigate the medical device and funding spaces and Deepika Grover who helped with communications and the search for funding.

Funding

This study is made possible by support from the CDC Foundation award number 1085.1 and the Aliko Dangote Foundation grant number GS2008-0001. The findings and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC Foundation or the Aliko Dangote Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AA, AF, AS, OGO, IO, BS, OE, AH, and MHA conceived and designed the study. AA, IO, and AM analyzed the data. MHA, AF, BS, IO, AH, and OGO applied for and secured funding for the study. BM, NN, SA, CF, AD, AA, MS, AO, MR, and OO contributed to the data collection. AS, IO, BM, and AA led the design and implementation of the clinical training component. All authors contributed to the data interpretation. MA, OO, IO, and AA drafted the initial versions of the article. All authors made major contributions to the writing and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André A. Fenton.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of The University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Informed consent to participate was obtained from all study participants.

Consent for publication

No identifiable participant details are included in this submission. All authors have read and agree to the submission of this work.

Competing interests

AH is a founder and AAF is an advisor to Ventilator Project LLC.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahonkhai, A.A., Musa, A.Z., Fenton, A.A. et al. The CircumVent Project: a CPAP/O2 helmet solution for non-invasive ventilation using an implementation research framework. Implement Sci Commun 2, 93 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00193-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00193-y

Keywords