Skip to main content

Nurses’ perceptions on implementing a task-shifting/sharing strategy for hypertension management in patients with HIV in Nigeria: a group concept mapping study

Abstract

Background

People living with HIV (PWH) in Africa have higher burden of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) compared to the general population, probably due to increased burden of hypertension (HTN). In this study, we explored nurses’ perceptions of factors that may influence the integration of an evidence-based task-shifting/sharing strategy for hypertension control (TASSH) into routine HIV care in Lagos, Nigeria.

Methods

Using group concept mapping, we examined the perceptions of 22 nurses from HIV clinics in Lagos. Participants responded to a focused prompt on the barriers and facilitators of integrating TASSH into HIV care; next, separate focus groups generated relevant statements on these factors; and statements were then sorted and rated on their importance and feasibility of adoption to create cluster maps of related themes. The statements and cluster maps were categorized according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains.

Results

All study participants were women and with 2 to 16 years’ experience in the provision of HIV care. From the GCM activities, 81 statements were generated and grouped into 12 themes. The most salient statements reflected the need for ongoing training of HIV nurses in HTN management and challenges in adapting TASSH in HIV clinics. A synthesis of the cluster themes using CFIR showed that most clusters reflected intervention characteristics and inner setting domains. The potential challenges to implementing TASSH included limited hypertension knowledge among HIV nurses and the need for on-going supervision on implementing task-shifting/sharing.

Conclusions

Findings from this study illustrate a variety of opinions regarding the integration of HTN management into HIV care in Nigeria. More importantly, it provides critical, evidence-based support in response to the call to action raised by the 2018 International AIDS Society Conference regarding the need to implement more NCD-HIV integration interventions in low-and middle-income countries through strategies, which enhance human resources. This study provides insight into factors that can facilitate stakeholder engagement in utilizing study results and prioritizing next steps for TASSH integration within HIV care in Nigeria.

Peer Review reports

Background

Compared to the general population, people living with HIV (PWH) have higher cardiovascular diseases (CVD) related mortality [1, 2], likely due to the increased burden of hypertension (HTN) [3], which affects approximately 14% of PWH in Africa [4]. Based on the Global Burden of Disease report, Nigeria had an increase in mortality from 1990 to 2015 among adults with uncontrolled HTN [5]. Because Nigeria still grapples with a stubbornly unrelenting burden of HIV [6] and a shortage in healthcare workers [7], there is an urgent need for evidence-based strategies targeted at HTN control among PWH, particularly strategies which also address the shortage of healthcare workers.

Addressing the health worker shortage and HTN control in Nigeria through task-shifting/sharing

Similar to other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the acute shortage of healthcare workers is a major barrier to HTN control in Nigeria, which has only 3 physicians per 10,000 population [8]. In particular, this shortage of healthcare workers limits Nigeria’s capacity to control hypertension at the primary care level, where the majority of PWH receive care. To address healthcare human resource challenges as well as the increasing disease burdens within the country, Nigeria’s Ministry of Health (MOH) developed a Task-shifting and Task-sharing Policy for Essential Health Care Services in 2014 with a focus on meeting these challenges at all levels of care [9]. A proven and practical model for improving the management of communicable and non-communicable diseases [10], task-shifting/sharing emphasizes the rational distribution of skills from physicians to underutilized, non-physicians such as nurses and community health workers [7]. While previous studies in Africa have successfully implemented a task-shifting/sharing approach for individual diseases like HIV [11] and hypertension [12], a limited number examine the approach for integrated chronic disease management [13]. Although, the current task-shifting/sharing policy in Nigeria focuses on priority areas such as family and reproductive health, HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria, there is currently no evidence of the policy’s implementation in the integration of HTN management and control into HIV care.

Adapting an evidence-based task-shifting/sharing strategy for hypertension control

In the case of CVD management, task-shifting/sharing has been shown to be an effective strategy in LMIC settings overburdened with healthcare workforce shortages and the increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) [10]. For example, in a cluster randomized clinical trial of 32 health centers in Ghana, Ogedegbe et al. [7] noted that the addition of a task-shifting strategy for hypertension control or TASSH delivered by trained community health nurses led to a 34% greater reduction in systolic BP than the provision of health insurance coverage alone [7]. Based on the WHO CVD Risk Package [14], components of the TASSH intervention include (1) CVD management clinical decision support using validated WHO risk charts, (2) lifestyle counseling for patients, and (3) medication titration (either increasing a dose or adding a second medication) and patient referral to physicians for the management of complicated HTN [7]. Nurses in the intervention arm were trained in each of these components during yearly training sessions for the study duration [7]. While TASSH has shown to be successful in controlling hypertension in Ghana, the intervention has yet to be applied in integrating hypertension into the HIV care cascade.

Prioritizing the need to integrate hypertension control into HIV care in Nigeria

With access to highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) in LMICs leading to increased survival [2], people living with HIV (PWH) are at an increased risk for NCDs like CVD [15]. The 2018 International AIDS Society Conference acknowledged the growing burden of comorbid NCDs in PWH and proposed an integrated model of care whereby management of NCDs is integrated into HIV chronic care platforms as a cost-effective strategy [15, 16]. Researchers at the meeting also expressed an urgent need for more evidence on implementing integrated HIV-NCD care in LMICs with a critical shortage of health workforce [15]. Based on the successful implementation of TASSH in Ghana [7] along with the similarity in healthcare systems of both countries, the current study explores the perceptions of HIV clinic nurses on the barriers and facilitators of integrating TASSH into routine HIV care for the management of HTN in PWH in Lagos, Nigeria. This information enabled the research team to evaluate the feasibility of implementing TASSH as an integrated model for the management of HTN in HIV clinics for an NIH grant submission, which has since been awarded.

Methods and data analysis

Study setting and recruitment

This study took place at the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research (NIMR)—a research arm of the Federal Ministry of Health, Nigeria. NIMR offers a wide spectrum of public health services and clinical research in HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, neglected tropical diseases, maternal and reproductive health, and NCDs among others. It has a comprehensive HIV treatment center with over 25,000 PWH cumulatively enrolled in care since 2004. A total of 22 HIV clinic nurses were recruited, from 20 HIV clinics in Lagos, to participate in the study through convenience sampling wherein supervisors selected nurses based on staffing availability. The 20 HIV clinics were a subset of the clinics that will be selected for the proposed intervention. In addition to being representative of the 20 HIV clinics, all of the HIV nurses participated in the brainstorming as well as the sorting and rating activities while 18 of the 22 nurses participated in the group concept mapping (GCM) discussion activity. The rationale for the sample size was based on similar studies using GCM strategy [17]. All participants provided written informed consent and the study was approved by NIMR’s Institutional Review Board.

Study objective and design

To better understand HIV nurses’ perceptions on TASSH, we employed GCM methodology. GCM uses a mixed-methods participatory approach to stakeholder engagement, in a six-step process (preparation, generation, structuring, representation, interpretation, and utilization) to assess the perceptions of participants on a specific topic by generating illustrative conceptual frameworks of the target group’s views [18, 19]. For this study, HIV clinic nurses were engaged in GCM activities to elicit their thoughts on an integrated HIV-NCD model using a task-shifting/sharing strategy for the management of hypertension in PWH. GCM analyses were conducted using the Concept Systems Global Max software (Concept Systems, Inc., Ithaca, NY) [18]. Figure 1 depicts how the GCM methodology was adapted for the purposes of this study in the following stages: brainstorming, sorting and rating, and GCM data analysis and final group discussion. At the first GCM group meeting, a discussion took place on the aims and outcomes of the Ghana TASSH intervention study to address any questions participants had about the intervention. Data was collected in March 2019.

Fig. 1
figure1

GCM stages

Brainstorming stage

The nurses provided succinct statements in response to the following prompt: “In order for HIV clinic nurses to successfully adopt a task-shifting/sharing strategy for hypertension control among people living with HIV, they need....” Responses were manually entered into the Concept Systems software to generate a list of statements that reflects each nurse’s response by creating individual profiles for each nurse with a unique ID code. This process yielded a final set of statements which were randomly sorted and printed out on separate sorting cards for group discussion. Nurses also responded to a brief demographic survey on their applicable HIV work experience.

Sorting and rating stage

The nurses participated in two separate focus group sessions [led by AA and DO], where they worked in pairs to sort the final list of statements into grouped piles that made sense to them and based on their current practice within the HIV clinics. Participants were instructed to create as many piles as needed while making sure there were not too many or too few piles. After sorting the statements, they then rated each statement on their perceived importance [on a 3-point scale, with 1 being “important” and 3 being “very important”] and potential feasibility [on a 4-point Likert scale, with 1 being “not feasible” and 4 being “extremely feasible”] concerning the proposed intervention [TASSH].

Data analysis

After sorting and rating, the final statements were entered into the Concept Mapping software, which uses multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis to graphically show points representing statements that were frequently sorted together being more proximal to each other and infrequently sorted statements being further apart [20]. MDS produces several visual outputs including a point map, cluster map, and go-zone rating—all of which are shared with the participants to discuss their interpretability and to come to an agreement on the representativeness of the raw data with the outputs [19, 21]. For example, the “cluster map” output shows how the statements generated, represented by points, were grouped by participants [21]. In this study, the MDS yielded two viable cluster maps representing 8 and 12 cluster groupings of statements.

Interpreting the GCM maps through final group discussion

Following the MDS analysis, another focus group with a subset of the nurses (18 total) was convened to provide them feedback on the two cluster maps and the final cluster map groupings and discuss their views. For this purpose, we printed out the cluster maps and shared the analytical outputs with the nurses. The nurses were asked to vote on which cluster, i.e., choosing between the 8 or 12 cluster grouping, was most representative of their perspectives of TASSH. They were also asked to provide feedback on potential adaptations to TASSH based on their interpretation of the cluster maps. The nurses were also presented with Go-Zone matrices which show sets of rated statements in the cluster maps, where each statement is assigned coordinates based on mean rating on x- and y-axis. The Go-Zone creates four quadrants based on ratings of the statements (above or below the mean) for its importance and feasibility of integrating it into the proposed intervention [TASSH]. The Go-Zone creates the following zones: high importance-high feasibility (green zone), high importance-low feasibility (yellow zone), low importance-high feasibility (orange zone), and low importance-low feasibility (gray zone). The high-high quadrant (i.e., high importance and high feasibility) is typically considered the Go-Zone because it includes the ideas rated most highly for both criteria, which in this case, is the importance and feasibility of the rated statement for integrating hypertension management into HIV care via a task-shifting/sharing strategy. At the conclusion of this focus group, the nurses also provided additional feedback on specific challenges for integrating an intervention like TASSH into HIV care. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted for this final feedback.

Mapping the clustered themes to CFIR

Following the group GCM activities, we used the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR) to map the 12 clusters and further assess how they could be tailored for the implementation of the intervention. CFIR also provides a practical guide for evaluating stakeholders’ perceptions on the feasibility and importance of implementing an evidence-based program, in this case, TASSH. Developed by Damschroder and colleagues, CFIR provides an overarching typology for the systematic assessment of factors, which may influence an intervention’s implementation and effectiveness [22, 23]. Consisting of five domains (intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of the individuals involved, and the process of implementation), each with their related constructs, CFIR has been used as a rapid-cycle evaluation guide of stakeholder’s perceptions on the implementation of a healthcare intervention [23].

Results

Applying GCM, nurses generated a total of 125 statements, which were reviewed by two members of the research team (AA and DO) to remove redundant statements and statements not relevant to the prompt, leaving a final set of 81 statements. Figure 2 represents the point map of the 81 statements, depicting the varied spread and relative closeness of the statements. In the following sections, we provide the findings on participant’s TASSH-related demographic data, results from the GCM activities, the mapping of the 12 clusters to the CFIR domains, and feedback on specific challenges for integrating TASSH.

Fig. 2
figure2

Final point map

Participants’ TASSH-related demographic data

All study participants were women, with 2 to 16 years’ experience in the provision of HIV care. Initial group discussions with participants showed that they were familiar with the task-shifting/sharing approach but had not participated in a task-shifting/sharing intervention for integrating hypertension management and control into HIV treatment at their local clinics. The nurses had worked in HIV care for an average of 6 years, and they care for approximately 79 patients per day, of which about 41 are PWH. Regarding the essential duties of the nurses specifically related to components of the proposed TASSH intervention, 60% routinely perform finger prick glucose test; 67% conduct urine dipstick, with approximately 94% engaged in patient education and counseling on lifestyle modification.

GCM activities’ output

As noted in Fig. 3, the nurses selected a 12-cluster map which they believed best characterized their understanding of the key factors that may facilitate or hinder the integration of hypertension management into HIV care using a task-shifting/sharing strategy. For GCM, and through the MDS analysis, a “stress value” of the point map is typically generated to determine how well the MDS solution maps to the inputted data and indicates a goodness of fit [21]. In this study, the stress value for the cluster maps was 0.29 demonstrating overall good fit. The representative statements for each of the 12 clusters along with their corresponding number are shown in Table 1.

Fig. 3
figure3

Cluster map with corresponding legend for the 12 themes

Table 1 Twelve clusters with corresponding statements

Figure 4 shows the Go-Zone ratings generated for all 81 statements and the 12 cluster map. Five statements were rated high for importance and feasibility of integrating hypertension management into HIV care. These include “Ensure regular monitoring of BP at every clinic visit” (statement 5); “Provision of counselling to the patients” (statement 17); “Monitor vital signs regularly” (statement 18); “Re-educating patients on importance of diet, rest, and adherence in the management of HIV/Hypertension” (statement 26); and “Encouraging patient on the importance of adherence to drug regimen to prevent relapse in healthcare” (statement 34). Conversely, the statement rated the lowest for importance and feasibility was “Ensuring that each patient has their BP apparatus to monitor their blood pressure at regular intervals and comes to the hospital in case there is any rise in blood pressure” (statement 42).

Fig. 4
figure4

Feasibility and importance Go-Zone

The 12 cluster themes and the CFIR domains

Based on the discussions with the nurses and their applicability to the study, we mapped the themes or clusters to four domains of CFIR—i.e., inner settings, outer settings, intervention characteristics, and characteristics of the individuals involved. The fifth domain, implementation process, was not applicable for the purpose of this study. Table 2 shows the CFIR domains and the corresponding theme or cluster. The majority of the 12 cluster themes selected by nurses were considered by the research team to be most applicable to the inner setting and intervention characteristics domains. While the individuals involved domain only had one cluster theme that seemed most relevant.

Table 2 CFIR domains and the associated clusters

Feedback on specific challenges for integration

After the GCM discussions and as part of their closing remarks at the final group meeting, the nurses provided additional feedback on content specific barriers that might hinder the integration of hypertension management into HIV care in their clinics. The barriers identified were divided into the following categories: nurses’ perspectives on work-related challenges and nurses’ perspectives on patient barriers. Nurses’ perspectives on work-related challenges included the shortage of nurses at primary healthcare centers; work ethics of health workers (including nurses); limited knowledge of hypertension, CVD risk assessment, and prescribing hypertension medication; and inadequate provision of tools/ resources for hypertension management. Regarding nurses’ perspectives on patient barriers, the following were highlighted: patients’ limited knowledge of hypertension and self-management; the inability of patients to prioritize payments for anti-hypertensive medication in addition to HIV medication; and high medication cost.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to use a rigorous mixed-methods GCM methodology to explore the perceptions of HIV clinic nurses on the factors that may facilitate or hinder the integration of hypertension management into the HIV care using an evidence-based task-shifting/sharing strategy for hypertension control. We identified 81 statements, which were grouped into 12 clusters representing key factors HIV nurses chose as most comprehensive or fitting for implementing a task-shifting/sharing strategy to integrate hypertension management into HIV care.

As noted in the cluster map and based on other studies using concept mapping [24], the points or statements which are closer denote those themes which the MDS analysis found to be more closely related than those points which are farther apart. The same logic applies to the clusters themselves, i.e., those in close proximity are conceptually related in comparison to those farther apart. In terms of the size or shape of the clusters, Schell and Luke [24] note that typically smaller, denser clusters represent concepts or statements which the HIV nurses believed to be more acceptable or compatible; while the larger clusters denote more dispersed ideas. Interestingly, statements represented in clusters 7 (“equipment”), 10 (“proper training of nurses for administration”), and 9 (“health Education”) were proximal to one another, showing that the statements for each cluster were closely related to each other. These three clusters were also among the smaller, denser groupings—meaning that HIV nurses found these statements to be more acceptable for implementing a task-shifting/sharing strategy for hypertension management. Additionally, the stress value of 0.29 indicates that the final cluster was representative of the nurses’ perspectives. For GCM, a lower stress value indicates a better fit and reflects a stronger relationship between optimal and actual configurations [21]. Other studies have used a value of 0.35 or greater to indicate a higher stress value, i.e., a greater discrepancy between the inputted data and the generated concept map [25]. Our findings are in line with those of other studies that evaluated task-shifting/sharing strategy for hypertension management [7, 12, 17, 26]. Blackstone et al. [26] also noted that proper training of nurses was particularly important for sustaining a task-shifting/sharing strategy for hypertension management.

This study extends our previous work on the capabilities, opportunities, and motivations of HIV clinics in Lagos State’s practice capacity to integrate hypertension management into HIV care [27], by specifically focusing on the perspectives of the HIV clinic nurses on the barriers and facilitators of implementing a task-shifting/ sharing intervention. The application of GCM noted that for HIV nurses, implementing TASSH as part of the routine care was not only feasible but also regarded as highly important to adequately address the burden of hypertension among PWH. Furthermore, the low stress value from the concept mapping analysis shows congruency in the sorted and rated statements by the HIV nurses and the generated maps -  validating that this mixed-methods approach adequately represented the perceptions of the HIV nurses. Other GCM studies have also noted similar findings regarding the representativeness of a lower stress value for the final model with the statements generated by participants [26, 28].

Findings from our study underscore the importance of developing nurse-based strategies to integrate hypertension management into HIV care given the limited availability of evidence supporting context-specific strategies in Africa [29]. A recent review by Vorkoper and colleagues noted that implementation science research will be critical in efforts to integrate evidence-based interventions into existing HIV chronic care platforms given the emphasis on context-appropriate approaches for sustained health interventions [29]. One such example of a flexible, adaptable implementation science framework is CFIR. The application of CFIR to the 12 clusters or themes chosen by the nurses is a useful approach for evaluating which factors or domains are most relevant for an intervention that is being tailored to a specific context. While all five CFIR domains are most commonly used to understand the context within which evidence-based strategies are implemented [23], in our study, the domain(s) which stood out the most, i.e., those associated with the majority of the themes were inner settings and intervention characteristics, with each matched to 4 of the 12 themes. The fact that most clusters were more applicable to a few CFIR domains as opposed to all, points to the need to consider the specific contextual factors which may have more implications on the implementation and/or adaptation of an intervention like TASSH in a different setting, particularly for integrated care platforms. Although we are not aware if other studies have applied CFIR when analyzing stakeholder’s perceptions of task-shifting/sharing strategy for hypertension management in PWH in LMICs, our findings underscore the applicability of using CFIR as an analytical guide for implementing and adapting stakeholder’s perceptions of evidence-based interventions.

Limitations and strengths

There were a few limitations. First, we only sampled 22 nurses, most of whom were staff nurses, but did not include other allied health workers [e.g., Community Health Extension Workers] who might also provide care in HIV clinics in Nigeria. Such a small sample size along with the lack of variety in HIV clinic health workers limits the generalizability of the study findings. Despite this limitation, an asset of the study is the inclusion of participants from HIV clinics where the proposed intervention will be implemented. Second, the concept mapping exercise was labor intensive and required several hours of focus and participation by the nurses over the course of 2 days. This might have prevented more nurses from participating because of work demands at their various health facilities. Third, not all the nurses from the first session completed the concept mapping exercise from the second session (though all nurses at the concept mapping session were part of the first session). While it would have been ideal that all of the HIV clinic nurses participated in all of the GCM related activities and sessions, an advantage of GCM is that it is not a requirement to have every single person participate in each activity [30]. Finally, the mapping of the CFIR domains to the 12 cluster themes did not follow a specific analytical approach but was rather based on a simple synthesis of the themes based on the feedback from the HIV nurses. A more thorough content analysis using qualitative methods may have provided additional insight on the applicability of CFIR to the 12 clusters. Despite these limitations, the use of concept mapping supports the application of novel, mixed methods approaches for engaging stakeholders in LMICs who are primarily responsible for adapting task-shifting/sharing strategies.

Implications

Given the increasing need to address NCDs among PWH in regions with shortages in healthcare workers, interventions tailored to address the dual disease burden while simultaneously enhancing the capacity of key healthcare professionals are of most importance. Despite the establishment of a task-shifting/sharing policy and the prevalence of hypertension among PWHs, Nigeria has yet to institute the approach for integrating NCDs like hypertension into the HIV care continuum. The current study provides contextual evidence of potential barriers and facilitators for implementing a proven task-shifting/sharing intervention for hypertension management within the Lagos State primary healthcare system. Notably, the findings point to factors such as additional health education, human resources, training nurses on hypertension-related HIV treatment, and proper patient counseling or education, which may influence the implementation of a task-shifting/sharing intervention for hypertension management. For an intervention like TASSH to be successfully adopted as part of the routine care offered, there must be targeted consideration for incorporating these factors for integrating hypertension care while simultaneously addressing healthcare worker shortages in HIV clinics in Lagos, Nigeria. Given the burden of comorbid HIV and NCDs in LMICs, future research should consider the feasibility of scaling up task-shifting/sharing strategy for integrating hypertension management into the HIV care cascade across impacted countries and regions.

Conclusion

Engaging and understanding stakeholders’ perceptions of feasibility of an evidence-based intervention beyond its initial implementation, can provide critical insights for developing sustainable programs in LMICs [17]. Nurses play a major role in the implementation of task-shifting strategies, particularly when addressing integrated care platforms for comorbid HIV and hypertension. For these reasons and more, this study provides critical, evidence-based support in response to the call to action raised by the 2018 International AIDS Society Conference regarding the need to implement more NCD-HIV integration interventions in LMICs through strategies that enhance human resources. As non-communicable diseases become more pervasive among PWH in LMICs still overburdened with communicable diseases and shortages in healthcare workers, context-specific integrated care platforms will be critical in addressing dual disease burden, particularly among PWH and comorbid NCDs. Findings from our study provide highly relevant and emergent evidence in support of the exploration of key stakeholders’ perceptions on the feasibility and importance of implementing a task-shifting/sharing strategy for the integration of hypertension management into HIV care.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

NIMR:

Nigerian Institute of Medical Research

HAART:

Highly active antiretroviral therapy

GCM:

Group concept mapping

WHO:

World Health Organization

CFIR:

Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

MOH:

Ministry of Health

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

HTN:

Hypertension

TASSH:

Task-shifting strategy for hypertension control

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency viruses

AIDS:

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

PWH:

People living with HIV

NCDs:

Non-communicable diseases

LMICs:

Low- and middle-income countries

AA:

Angela Aifah

DO:

Deborah Onakomaiya

JI:

Juliet Iwelunmor

DAO:

David Oladele

CO:

Chisom Obiezu-Umeh

UN:

Ucheoma Nwaozuru

TG:

Titilola Gbajabiamila

AM:

Adesola Z. Musa

OE:

Oliver Ezechi

GO:

Gbenga Ogedegbe

References

  1. 1.

    Freiberg MS, Chang C-CH, Kuller LH, Skanderson M, Lowy E, Kraemer KL, et al. HIV infection and the risk of acute myocardial infarction. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(8):614–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Patel P, Rose CE, Collins PY, Nuche-Berenguer B, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Peprah E, et al. Noncommunicable diseases among HIV-infected persons in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS (London, England). 2018;32(Suppl 1):S5.

  3. 3.

    Peck RN, Shedafa R, Kalluvya S, Downs JA, Todd J, Suthanthiran M, et al. Hypertension, kidney disease, HIV and antiretroviral therapy among Tanzanian adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):125.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bigna JJR, Nansseu JRN, Um LN, Noumegni SRN, Simé PSD, Aminde LN, et al. Prevalence and incidence of pulmonary hypertension among HIV-infected people in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e011921.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Forouzanfar MH, Liu P, Roth GA, Ng M, Biryukov S, Marczak L, et al. Global burden of hypertension and systolic blood pressure of at least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990-2015. Jama. 2017;317(2):165–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Piot P, Bartos M, Ghys PD, Walker N, Schwartländer B. The global impact of HIV/AIDS. Nature. 2001;410(6831):968.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ogedegbe G, Plange-Rhule J, Gyamfi J, Chaplin W, Ntim M, Apusiga K, et al. Health insurance coverage with or without a nurse-led task shifting strategy for hypertension control: A pragmatic cluster randomized trial in Ghana. PLoS Med. 2018;15(5):e1002561.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Organization WH. World health statistics 2015: World Health Organization; 2015.

  9. 9.

    Health NMo. Task-shifting and tasksharing policy for essential health care services in Nigeria. Nigeria: Nigerian Ministry of Health 2014.

  10. 10.

    Joshi R, Thrift AG, Smith C, Praveen D, Vedanthan R, Gyamfi J, et al. Task-shifting for cardiovascular risk factor management: lessons from the Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(Suppl 3):e001092.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Callaghan M, Ford N, Schneider H. A systematic review of task-shifting for HIV treatment and care in Africa. Hum Resour Health. 2010;8(1):8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gyamfi J, Plange-Rhule J, Iwelunmor J, Lee D, Blackstone SR, Mitchell A, et al. Training nurses in task-shifting strategies for the management and control of hypertension in Ghana: a mixed-methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):104.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Limbani F, Thorogood M, Gómez-Olivé FX, Kabudula C, Goudge J. Task shifting to improve the provision of integrated chronic care: realist evaluation of a lay health worker intervention in rural South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(1):e001084.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Organization WH, Programme WHOCD. WHO CVD-risk management package for low-and medium-resource settings: World Health Organization; 2002.

  15. 15.

    El-Sadr WM, Goosby E. Building on the HIV platform: tackling the challenge of noncommunicable diseases among persons living with HIV. Aids. 2018;32:S1–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Njuguna B, Vorkoper S, Patel P, Reid MJ, Vedanthan R, Pfaff C, et al. Models of integration of HIV and noncommunicable disease care in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons learned and evidence gaps. Aids. 2018;32:S33–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Iwelunmor J, Blackstone S, Gyamfi J, Airhihenbuwa C, Plange-Rhule J, Tayo B, et al. A concept mapping study of physicians’ perceptions of factors influencing management and control of hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Hypertens. 2015;2015.

  18. 18.

    Burke JG, O’Campo P, Peak GL, Gielen AC, McDonnell KA, Trochim WM. An introduction to concept mapping as a participatory public health research method. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(10):1392–410.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Trochim W, Kane M. Concept mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17(3):187–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    De Leeuw J, Mair P. Multidimensional scaling using majorization: SMACOF in R; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Aarons GA, Sommerfeld DH, Chi BH, Ezeanolue EE, Sturke R, Guay L, et al. Concept mapping of PMTCT implementation challenges and solutions across 6 sub-Saharan African countries in the NIH-PEPFAR PMTCT implementation science alliance. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2016;72:S202–S6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Keith RE, Crosson JC, O’Malley AS, Cromp D, Taylor EF. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: a rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Schell SF, Luke DA, Schooley MW, Elliott MB, Herbers SH, Mueller NB, et al. Public health program capacity for sustainability: a new framework. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Michalski GV, Cousins JB. Differences in stakeholder perceptions about training evaluation: a concept mapping/pattern matching investigation. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2000;23(2):211–30.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Blackstone S, Iwelunmor J, Plange-Rhule J, Gyamfi J, Quakyi NK, Ntim M, et al. Sustaining nurse-led task-shifting strategies for hypertension control: a concept mapping study to inform evidence-based practice. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs. 2017;14(5):350–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Iwelunmor J, Ezechi O, Obiezu-Umeh C, Gbajabiamila T, Musa AZ, Oladele D, et al. Capabilities, opportunities and motivations for integrating evidence-based strategy for hypertension control into HIV clinics in Southwest Nigeria. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0217703.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Rosas SR, Kane M. Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: a pooled study analysis. Evaluation and program planning. 2012;35(2):236–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Vorkoper S, Kupfer LE, Anand N, Patel P, Beecroft B, Tierney WM, et al. Building on the HIV chronic care platform to address noncommunicable diseases in sub-Saharan Africa: a research agenda. Aids. 2018;32:S107–S13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Trochim WM. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and program planning. 1989;12(1):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are especially grateful to the key stakeholders, the HIV clinic nurses, who provided invaluable input and generously gave of their time for this study. The authors would also like to extend our gratitude to the HIV clinic administrators and supervisors for their assistance in engaging and granting the nurses the time to participate in the study.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HL147811. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Drs. Gbenga Ogedegbe, Juliet Iwelunmor, and Oliver Ezechi are supported by a grant received from the NIH R01 HL147811-01A1. Dr. Angela Aifah was supported by grants received from the NIH R01 HL147811-01A1 and T32HL129953.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GO conceived the idea for the pilot study. AA developed a protocol for the study. OE and DAO secured IRB approval for the study and recruited the nurses. AA and DO conducted the GCM exercise with nurses and analyzed the data under supervision from JI. UN and CO assisted AA with collecting the initial data from the nurses. DAO and OE provided guidance for interpreting the data provided by the nurses. AA, DO, GO, and JI supervised and validated the background, methods, and results. GO validated the discussion. AA and DO drafted the full manuscript. CO, UN, TG, and AM reviewed drafts and provided written feedback. GO, JI, DAO, and OE edited the paper for critical content. All authors contributed substantially to the preparation of this manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Aifah.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. All participants provided written informed consent and the study was approved by Nigerian Institute of Medical Research’s Institutional Review Board.

Consent for publication

This manuscript does not contain any identifiable data in any form, either at the organizational level or at the individual level.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aifah, A., Onakomaiya, D., Iwelunmor, J. et al. Nurses’ perceptions on implementing a task-shifting/sharing strategy for hypertension management in patients with HIV in Nigeria: a group concept mapping study. Implement Sci Commun 1, 58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00048-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Nurses’ perceptions
  • Group concept mapping
  • Integrated care
  • Hypertension
  • HIV care
  • Task-shifting
  • Task-sharing